Grounding and Limiting Political Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) Using a Neo-Aristotelian Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21372004 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daryl Koehn (0000-0002-7705-0597, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 341-361 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Today (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8256 • E-ISSN: 2329-8596 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/philtoday202449528 |
| OpenAlex | W4394895880 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
This paper offers a neo-Aristotelian approach to PCSR aimed at enabling us to more systematically ascertain which sorts of corporate political activities, if any, might be politically acceptable. Part 1 sketches Aristotle’s account of the “political.” Aristotelian politics have at least four key dimensions. When we speak of PCSR, we should, from this Aristotelian perspective, evaluate how specific behaviors accord with or undermine these four aspects of political life. Part 2 of the paper explores which forms of activity by corporations qualify as genuinely (and thus acceptably) political within a neo-Aristotelian framework. Part 3 highlights strengths and limitations of this approach to PCSR
Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Key (lock) · Limiting · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Engineering · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |