Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Research Note

When Is a Day Reporting Center Evaluation Not a Day Reporting Center Evaluation? Lessons From a Systematic Review

Bibliographic Data

ID21373235
AuthorsJoel Miller (0000-0001-6865-5511, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Anthony Azari (0000-0003-2190-6525, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Year2025
Volume105
Issue2
Pages200-218
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Prison Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-8855 • E-ISSN: 1552-7522
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00328855241309113
LanguageEN
References cited32

We offer practical lessons from a systematic review of day reporting centers (DRCs). The review involved electronic searches, bibliographic reviews, and expert consultations followed by full text reviews of potentially eligible studies. Search results highlight the substantial role of nonacademic studies in the DRC literature, loose relationships between program characteristics and the DRC label, variations in the nature of both DRC and comparison group treatments, and a variety of methodological oversights in evaluation studies. We make a variety of recommendations both to program developers and evaluators, including an encouragement to focus on the content of programming alongside formal program titles

  • The Psychology of Criminal Conduct

    James Bonta, D A Andrews•Psychology of Criminal Conduct•2016

  • Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences

    Open Access•A Thornton, Alison J Thornton•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2000

  • A Quantitative Review of Structured, Group-Oriented, Cognitive-Behavioral Programs for Offenders

    Open Access•Darryl Babe Wilson, David B Wilson et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2005

  • Day Reporting Centers and Recidivism

    Open Access•Sharon S Oselin, M C Mahutga et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2023

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of the electronic monitoring of offenders

    Open Access•Jyoti Belur, Amy Thornton et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2020

  • Attendance Centres

    Open Access•Loraine Gelsthorpe, Allison Morris•The Howard Journal of Criminal…•1983

  • The Real Gold Standard

    Daniel S Nagin, Robert J Sampson•Annual Review of Criminology•2018

  • The Evolution of Correctional Program Assessment in the Age of Evidence-Based Practices

    Stephanie A Duriez, Carrie Sullivan et al.•Corrections•2017

  • Does Correctional Program Quality Really Matter? The Impact of Adhering to the Principles of Effective Intervention

    Open Access•CHRISTOPHER T LOWENKAMP, Edward J Latessa et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2006

  • An Evaluation of Day Reporting Centers for Parolees

    Open Access•Douglas J Boyle, Laura M Ragusa‐Salerno et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2013

  • Intensive supervision programs

    Open Access•CHRISTOPHER T LOWENKAMP, Anthony W Flores et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2010

  • Intensive Probation With Young Adult Offenders

    IAN D BROWNLEE, Ian Brownlee•The British Journal of Criminology•1995

  • Day Centre Reconviction Rates

    George Mair, Claire Nee•The British Journal of Criminology•1992

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae