Maintenance of Discriminative Function Across Successive and Simultaneous Procedures

Although simultaneous and successive discrimination procedures are both effective in establishing stimulus control, their direct comparison often suffers from procedural asymmetries. In this study, 10 undergraduate students were trained in simple discrimination tasks using either a simultaneous or successive format and tested for the maintenance of discriminative function by switching procedures. Half of the participants started with one procedure and the other half with the alternative. Discriminative performance was transferred nearly perfectly across procedures, with high accuracy in the test phase, regardless of the training format. However, simultaneous training required fewer blocks to reach criterion, and response latencies were significantly shorter during an interaction between procedure and phase, with simultaneous-to-successive transfer associated with longer latencies during testing. A modified cumulative arousal model fit the successive group data well but underestimated learning in the simultaneous group. These findings highlight procedural features that influence acquisition rates and response latencies and may help advance research in discrimination learning

Discrimination learning · Discriminative model · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Stimulus (psychology) · Stimulus control · Training set · Behavioral and Psychological Studies · Motor Control and Adaptation · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

• Cognitive Load Theory

  John Sweller•The psychology of learning and…•2011

  Add to list

• Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design

  Open Access•John Sweller•Learning and Instruction•1994

  Add to list

• Analyzing the Stimulus Control Acquisition in Simple Discrimination Tasks through Eye Movement

  Open Access•Edson Massayuki Huziwara, Marcelo José Machado Silva et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2015

  Add to list