Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predicting performance on a statewide reading achievement test in Spanish with aimswebPlus Spanish

Bibliographic Data

ID21376352
AuthorsDavid A Klingbeil (0000-0003-2571-4424, Department of Educational Psychology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA, corresponding author), David J Osman (0000-0001-6937-6610, Department of Research and Evaluation Gibson Consulting Group Austin Texas USA), Caroline K Carberry (0000-0001-8276-3703, Department of Educational Psychology University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA), Jamison E Carrigan (0000-0003-1716-5832, Department of Educational Psychology University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA), Kimberly Berry‐Corie (Teaching and Learning Round Rock Independent School District Round Rock Texas USA)
Year2021
Volume58
Issue9
Pages1768-1781
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology in the Schools (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3085 • E-ISSN: 1520-6807
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pits.22535
OpenAlexW3162450817
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited35

The Every Student Succeeds Act requires that states make efforts to offer statewide achievement tests in languages, other than English, that are present to a significant extent in the state. Currently, four states offer Spanish reading or language arts assessments as part of their statewide testing program. In these states, practitioners may be interested in screening students who will complete the Spanish assessments to identify those who are at risk for poor performance. Spanish versions of curriculum‐based measures of reading appear well suited for this purpose. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected in a high‐performing district in Texas to investigate the predictive validity and diagnostic accuracy associated with the aimswebPlus Spanish scores when predicting statewide Spanish reading assessment performance for students in Grades 3 through 5. Across grades and seasons, the aimswebPlus Spanish scores explained a small amount of variance in statewide Spanish reading assessment ( r 2 = 0.17–0.30). When risk on the aimswebPlus was determined using the national 35th percentile, screening decisions were associated with poor sensitivity (range = 0.50–0.72). Decisions were associated with higher specificity (range = 0.67–0.84) with adequate specificity obtained in four of six comparisons. Limitations, practical implications, and future research directions are discussed

Academic achievement · Achievement test · Curriculum · Developmental psychology · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Percentile · Political science · Predictive validity · Psychometrics · Reading (process) · Standardized test · Statistics · Test (biology) · Test validity · Variance (accounting) · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Medicine · Parental Involvement in Education · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • Artificial Intelligence to Support Oral Reading Fluency Assessment in English and Spanish for Students With Reading Disabilities

    Open Access•Madeline D Price, R Alex Smith et al.•Learning Disability Quarterly•2026

  • A Gap in Reporting

    Open Access•Adelle K Sturgell, Emily R Forcht et al.•Psychology in the Schools•2025

  • Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems

    Open Access•John A Swets•Science•1988

  • The Argument-Based Approach to Validation

    Michael Kane, Matthew Burns•School Psychology Review•2013

  • The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading

    Open Access•David LaBerge, S Jay Samuels•Cognitive Psychology•1974

  • The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation

    Open Access•Paul Madley‐Dowd, Rachael Hughes et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2019

  • Mice

    Open Access•Stef Van Buuren, Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • Oral reading fluency as a screening tool with English learners

    Open Access•Kirsten W Newell, Robin S Codding et al.•Psychology in the Schools•2020

  • Reading development and dyslexia in a transparent orthography

    Open Access•Robert Davies, Fernando Cuetos et al.•Annals of Dyslexia•2007

  • Language Maintenance versus Language of Instruction

    Open Access•Chris Proctor, C Patrick Proctor et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2010

  • An argument-based approach to validity

    Michael T Kane•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae