La scienza dei premi Nobel per le scienze
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21377273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marta Viola (0000-0001-7970-5406, University of Turin, corresponding author), Marco Viola (0000-0003-2470-4283) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 64 |
| Pages | 83-93 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quaderni di Sociologia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-4952 • E-ISSN: 2421-5848 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/qds.3706 |
| OpenAlex | W3103900673 |
| Language | IT |
| References cited | 9 |
In this short essay, two books recently published in Italy are examined: Massimiano Bucchi’s Come vincere un premio Nobel. Il premio più famoso della scienza, and Emiliano Brancaccio and Giacomo Bracci’s Il discorso del potere. Il premio Nobel per l’Economia tra scienza, ideologia e politica. The books deal with complementary topics: the former is about the century-old history Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Physics, Physiology or Medicine, whereas the latter deals with the shorter history of the Prize in memory of Alfred Nobel for Economic Sciences. Both books provide insightful reflections for sociology of science and epistemology, and demonstrate (or recall) that the Nobel Prize makes a privileged ground for either teaching and doing research in these disciplines
Art · Humanities · Economic Theory and Institutions · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |