Qualitative reasoning or quantitative aggregation rules for impact assessment of policy options? A multiple criteria framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21378232 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giuseppe Munda (0000-0003-3398-2971, Joint Research Centre, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 3259-3277 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quality & Quantity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-5177 • E-ISSN: 1573-7845 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11135-021-01267-8 |
| OpenAlex | W3208836097 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 25 |
Economics · Environmental economics · Impact assessment · Management science · Obligation · Political science · Proportionality (law) · Public economics · Transparency (behavior) · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Law · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
How to select and how to rank projects
Social multi-criteria evaluation
Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries
Social Choice and Individual Values
Impact assessment in the European Commission – a system with multiple objectives
Criteria importance theory
Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making
Impact Assessment and the Liberalization of the EU Energy Markets
Public Management Decision Making
The Idea of Justice
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |