Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Covid-19 in Africa

A comparative analysis of early policy responses

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21381998
AutoresDavid Olusegun Sotola (0000-0001-5813-7550, Stellenbosch University), Pregala Pillay (0000-0002-2101-962X, Stellenbosch University), Hafte Gebreselassie Gebrihet (0000-0002-3436-641X, Stellenbosch University), Hafte Gebreselassie (Stellenbosch University)
Ano2021
Volume55
Fascículo1
Páginas229-242
Data de publicação2021-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRevista de Administração Pública (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0034-7612 • E-ISSN: 1982-3134
EditoraFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/0034-761220200427
OpenAlexW3134023439
SCIELO_PIDS0034-76122021000100229
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas3

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused turmoil around the world. In Africa, some similarities and differences could be observed in the nature of the outbreak and the policy responses across the continent. This article discusses the policy responses and reflects on their effectiveness as a containment strategy. We speculate on why these strategies seem to work or not, and the lessons therein. The analysis also examines the setting up of crisis teams and whether they indicate lack of trust in the existing public administration system. The article argues that though South African cases and testing diverged significantly from the rest of the continent, a wider similarity can be observed in pandemic management across the continent. The article identifies some factors including quick and early measures, recent experience managing epidemic/health crises, and a display of some form of community resilience acquired over years of living in a state of poor governance as some of the important factors in the management of the pandemic. We find there is a dearth of scholarship on crisis management in the context of public administration and suggest this should be an object of future study in the field. The use of ad-hoc crisis teams that assume emergency powers is a common practice, but there is insufficient rigorous analysis to show their effectiveness and impact on existing bureaucratic institutions

Bureaucracy · Business · Context (archaeology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Corporate governance · Crisis management · Development economics · Disease · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Psychological resilience · Scholarship · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Medicine · Psychology · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research

  • Governmental responses to Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Alketa Peci, Claudia N Avellaneda et al.•Revista de Administração Pública•2021

  • A comparative analysis of Covid-19 physical distancing policies in South Africa and Uganda

    Open Access•Sana Mohammad, Emma Apatu et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,4
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae