Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contract farming in Swaziland

Peasant differentiation and the constraints of land tenure

Bibliographic Data

ID2138774
AuthorsRichard Levins, Richard Levin (University of the Witwatersrand, corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume47
Issue2
Pages101-120
Publication date1988-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAfrican Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-0184 • E-ISSN: 1469-2872
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00020188808707693
OpenAlexW1969578801
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

Swaziland's Fourth National Development Plan advocates the development of outgrower schemes based on the example of Vuvulane Irrigated Farms as an alternative strategy for rural development (Swaziland government 1985:309). If this recommendation were to be adopted as agricultural policy, it would necessitate land reform in the areas where these schemes are to be established. This is because of the existing division in land ownership between Swazi Nation Land and freehold Title Deed Land. Swazi Nation Land is held by the King "in trust" for "the nation" and allocated through chiefs to Swazi subjects. Private property in land in Swaziland dates to the concessionary era when large scale concessions were made to European land speculators and prospective farmers in the late nineteenth century by King Mbandzeni. Contrary to what has been argued in much of the literature on Swaziland, this land division has not entailed the development of dualism in agriculture, with the "modern" agricultural sector based on freehold title deed land and the "traditional" sector on Swazi Nation Land (SNL). Rather, both the land division and dualism are products of the development of capitalist relations which have generated an uneven and differential development characterised by the evolution of large-scale multinational and South African dominated enterprises on freehold land, and the development of petty commodity production on SNL. One question arising out of the advocation of the development of outgrower schemes and various forms of contract farming in Swaziland relating to land tenure, is whether or not such schemes can be established on SNL. To put it more specifically: is private ownership in land a pre-requisite for the establishment of viable contract farming schemes? This study will show that while freehold land leased out to petty commodity producers is undoubtedly advantageous for the owners of capital, in terms of the extra control which can be exerted over petty commodity producers, this is by no means a pre-requisite for the development of outgrower schemes. While it will be demonstrated that land tenure is not indicative of the form of production which takes place in agriculture, the chief concern of this paper is to examine the extent to which outgrower schemes in Swaziland have succeeded in their stated objectives of bringing "commercial farming" to the peasantry. The key question which emerges is whether or not outgrower schemes facilitate peasant accumulation and create the conditions for the reproduction of a rich and/or middle peasantry. Answers to these questions will be sought through an examination of three outgrower schemes. Two of these, (Vuvulane Irrigated Farms and Mpetsheni Pineapple Settlement Scheme) are on freehold Title Deed Land, while one (Casalee Tobacco Project) is on both freehold and SNL where petty commodity producing participants are based. The paper argues that contract farming and outgrower schemes are best understood in the context of the social relations to which this form of capitalist development in agriculture gives rise. Such schemes have differentiating effects and create the conditions for the reproduction of a middle peasantry, as well as the potential for more systematic accumulation by peasant producers. In Swaziland land tenure both on SNL and freehold title deed land, through restricting the size of land holdings of scheme participants, may have constraining effects on the extent to which accumulation becomes possible for petty commodity producers on such schemes

Agricultural economics · Agricultural land · Agriculture · Archaeology · Economics · Geography · Land tenure · Peasant · Political science · Land Rights and Reforms · Legal Issues in South Africa · South African History and Culture

  • Linking agribusiness and small-scale farmers in developing countries

    Johann F Kirsten, Johann Kirsten et al.•Development Southern Africa•2002

  • The afterlife of living under contract, an epilogue

    Open Access•P D Little, Michael Watts•Journal of Agrarian Change•2021

  • Contract Farming in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Carlos Oya•Journal of Agrarian Change•2012

  • Kings, Commoners and Concessionaires

    Open Access•Philip Bonner•Kings, Commoners and Concessionaire…•1983

  • The private sector and rural development

    Open Access•Arthur A Goldsmith, Arthur Goldsmith•World Development•1985

  • Contract farming and smallholder outgrower schemes in less-developed countries

    Open Access•David Glover, David J Glover•World Development•1984

  • Contract farming and the peasantry

    Open Access•Mogens Buch‐Hansen, Henrik Secher Marcussen•Review of African Political Economy•1982

  • Traditional land tenure in Swaziland

    Richard Levin•Journal of Contemporary African…•1988

  • The Colonial Division of Space

    J Crush•The International Journal of…•1980

  • On The Class Location Of Contract Farmers In The Kenyan Economy

    Kate Currie, Larry Ray•Economy and Society•1986

  • Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa

    Harold Wolpe•Economy and Society•1972

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2002 - 2021 (20)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae