Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bangladesh’s hedging amidst the Sino–US rivalry

Bibliographic Data

ID21390632
AuthorsMohd Amdadul Haque (0000-0002-9867-0023, Shandong University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-18
Publication date2026-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Round Table (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0035-8533 • E-ISSN: 1465-4008
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00358533.2026.2691211
OpenAlexW7166849499
LanguageEN
References cited34

Bangladesh operates within a major power-defined framework and actively engages with the United States and China. Bangladesh’s geopolitical position in South Asia places it at the centre of the intensifying Sino–US rivalry, prompting Dhaka to adopt a subtle hedging strategy to safeguard national interests. This paper explores how Bangladesh uses strategic ambiguity and various partnerships to balance the competing influences of China and the US. The analysis covers economic, political and security aspects, detailing Bangladesh’s involvement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its trade ties with the US. The paper discusses the opportunities and challenges of this dual approach, including risks such as economic dependency and regional security issues, notably the Rohingya crisis. By examining Bangladesh’s flexible foreign policy, the paper highlights the importance of maintaining autonomy amid great-power competition, and small-state agency in global politics. The findings underline the need for ongoing strategic flexibility to promote sustainable development and regional stability

Agency (philosophy) · Ambiguity · Autonomy · Balance (ability) · China · Flexibility (engineering) · Geopolitics · Politics · Position (finance) · Rivalry · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development · International Relations and Foreign Policy

  • Getting hedging right

    Open Access•Cheng‐chwee Kuik•China International Strategy Review•2021

  • Sino-Indian rivalry in Indo-Pacific and Bangladesh’s geo-strategic hedging in response to its security threats

    Open Access•Al Amin, Al Amin Al Amin•Discover Global Society•2025

  • Regional Cooperation in South Asia

    Open Access•Aditi Paul•The Journal of Indian and Asian…•2020

  • Understanding Bangladesh-China relations

    Open Access•Lailufar Yasmin•Journal of Contemporary East Asia…•2023

  • Division in Indo-Pacific Strategy

    Open Access•Saroj Kumar Aryal, Adithyan Nair•East Asia•2024

  • Navigating great power competition

    Open Access•Hunter Marston•International Relations of the…•2023

  • Establishing Confucius Institutes

    Ying Zhou, Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk et al.•Journal of Contemporary China•2016

  • Small states and competing connectivity strategies

    Open Access•Johannes Plagemann•The Pacific Review•2021

  • Vietnam’s hedging amid U.S.-China Mekong rivalry

    Xuan Dung Phan•The Pacific Review•2024

  • Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia

    Evelyn Goh•International Security•2008

  • Bandwagoning for Profit

    Randall L Schweller•International Security•1994

  • Explaining Hedging

    Kuik Cheng-Chwee•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2024

  • The Prospect of Belt and Road Initiative in the Context of Bangladesh

    Open Access•Rubiat Saimum•China Report•2020

  • Reassessing Hedging

    Darren J Lim, Zack Cooper•Security Studies•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae