Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Election observer missions, linguistic shifts and methodological evolutions

Bibliographic Data

ID21390660
AuthorsBright Chimedza (0009-0002-7434-4124, University of Leicester, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-15
Publication date2026-07-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Round Table (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0035-8533 • E-ISSN: 1465-4008
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00358533.2026.2689037
OpenAlexW7167519400
LanguageEN
References cited26

A segment of the Zimbabwean electorate often ask, what is the purpose and credibility of international election observation missions. Restricting these concerns to Zimbabwe, this paper derives inspiration from that scepticism correlating it with the technical approach of the 2023 Commonwealth Election Observation Group (COG) to Zimbabwe. The paper largely focuses on linguistic and methodological concerns and does not explore the legitimacy of the elections themselves. It explicitly addresses the implications associated with the COG’s cautious language and the interpretive predicaments that arise from the measured tone. Adopting hermeneutic analysis, and a process-based framework for assessing election quality, it is argued that the COG approach has evolved, is circumspect in nature and the conclusions appear to be overly cautious. Explicitly informed by the COG 2023 findings, and implicit observations from other Commonwealth member states in Africa, the paper discovers a dissonance between the detailed narrative and conclusions relayed by the COG

Linguistic change · Observer (physics) · Cyprus History, Politics, Society · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance

  • The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Integrity

    Holly Ann Garnett, Toby S James•Oxford Handbook of Electoral…•2025

  • The Logic of Scientific Discovery

    Karl R Popper, Karl Popper et al.•Physics Today•1959

  • The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma

    Susan Hyde, Susan D Hyde•The pseudo-democrat's dilemma•2011

  • Make Sure They Count Nicely This Time’

    Sara Rich Dorman•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2005

  • Smoke and mirrors’

    Stuart Mole•The Round Table•2025

  • Election Observation and Deepening Democracy in the Commonwealth

    Amanda Sives•The Round Table•2001

  • Zimbabwe and Election Observation Missions

    Sue Onslow•The Round Table•2018

  • Commonwealth election observation and Nigeria

    Ademola Oshodi, Abdul-Gafar Tobi Oshodi•The Round Table•2020

  • The Observer Effect in International Politics

    Open Access•Susan Hyde, Susan D Hyde•World Politics•2007

  • Reconsidering the ‘free and fair’ question

    Michael D Boda•Representation•2005

  • Judging elections and election management quality by process

    Jørgen Elklit, Andrew Reynolds•Representation•2005

  • The Rise of Election Monitoring

    Open Access•Thomas Carothers•Journal of democracy•1997

  • Election Observers and Their Biases

    Open Access•Judith G Kelley, Judith Kelley•Journal of democracy•2010

  • Getting elections right? Measuring electoral integrity

    Carolien Van Ham•Democratization•2015

  • Fair? What Has Fairness Got to Do with It? Vagaries of Election Observations and Democratic Standards

    Open Access•Gisela Geisler•The Journal of Modern African…•1993

  • Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes

    Open Access•Sarah Birch•Electoral Studies•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae