The International Olympic Committee as policymaker
Identifying the leading areas of change in candidature, delivery and legacy aspects of the Olympic Games
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21390944 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia Jastrząbek (0000-0001-5628-6560, Poznań University of Economics and Business, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 215-235 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0035-9629 • E-ISSN: 2543-9170 |
| Publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.2.11 |
| OpenAlex | W4400547719 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
Studies on policy process provide a practical methodological approach for analysing how identified problems are addressed, or how other issues receive special attention from the entities responsible for policy design. In this article, it is argued that the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as an international non-governmental not-for-profit organization, has its own initiative to design policies and reforms aimed at solving problems and challenges that emerge during each stage of the Olympic Games lifecycle: candidature process, event organization, and realization of legacy strategy. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to identify the leading areas of change in the policy created by the IOC, based on the analysis of strategic documents published by this organization or its appointed commissions. The research applies qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative part is based on a critical literature review, elements of a case study, desk research, and comparative analysis. Quantitative methods are represented by the visualization of statistical data and the ‘text as data’ approach, where the IOC documents are analysed in the integrated development environment R Studio by using functions included in the quanteda R package. The main findings demonstrate the growing importance of sustainability and legacy in all aspects of the Olympic Games lifecycle, along with the implementation of consecutive policy reforms. One interesting conclusion that emerged from the analysis is that some recommendations are very similar or even recurrent. In this study, the research attention is also drawn to the fact that the usefulness and effectiveness of the policies implemented at various stages of the Olympic Games lifecycle are contingent upon the quality of the institutions of the host countries
Political science · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports, Gender, and Society
Mega-events and urban regeneration in Rio de Janeiro
Quanteda
Putin's Olympics
Text as Data
An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games
Interrogating States’ Soft Power Strategies
Soft Power, Sports Mega-Events and Emerging States
The Geopolitics of Global Aspiration
The mega-events database
The Olympic Effect
Public Opinion in Olympic Cities
Fragile growth coalitions or powerful contestations? Cancelled Olympic bids in Boston and Hamburg
Regression to the tail
The structural deficit of the Olympics and the World Cup
Comparing the Urban Impacts of the Fifa World Cup and Olympic Games From 2010 to 2016
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |