Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Utilitarian or Deontological? The Effect of Solving Distant Analogies on Moral Judgments

Bibliographic Data

ID21391927
AuthorsLina Sun (0000-0002-7536-6301, School of Psychology Northwest Normal University Lanzhou China), Shifeng Li (0000-0002-9921-314X, School of Psychology Northwest Normal University Lanzhou China, corresponding author), Jiansheng Li (0000-0002-3708-3677, School of Psychology Northwest Normal University Lanzhou China, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.70118
PMID42204919
OpenAlexW7162667993
LanguageEN
References cited31

Analogical reasoning involves mapping relational structure from a source domain to a target domain. Distant analogies, compared with near analogies, require reasoners to go beyond surface similarity and extract deeper relational structure. Because utilitarian judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas also involve evaluating structural trade‐offs between costs and benefits, the present study examined whether solving distant analogies increases approval of utilitarian actions. In Experiment 1, 175 Chinese university students were randomly assigned to solve either 40 distant or 40 near verbal analogies and then rated their approval of utilitarian actions across eight sacrificial moral dilemmas. In Experiment 2, 161 students completed the same procedure, except that the dilemmas were rewritten from a second‐person to a third‐person perspective. Across both experiments, participants in the distant‐analogy condition reported significantly higher approval of utilitarian actions than those in the near‐analogy condition. This effect remained significant after controlling for analogy accuracy in linear mixed‐effects models, and the Condition × Accuracy interactions were not significant in either experiment. These findings suggest that solving distant analogies can increase subsequent utilitarian approval in sacrificial moral dilemmas, possibly by promoting a relational, structure‐focused processing orientation

Analogical reasoning · Analogy · Domain specificity · Moral dilemma · Moral reasoning · Similarity (geometry) · Child and Animal Learning Development · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Revisiting External Validity

    Open Access•Christopher W Bauman, A Peter Mcgraw et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2014

  • Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2008

  • G*Power 3

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Science•2001

  • Achieving abstraction

    Caren M Walker, Samantha Q Hubachek et al.•Developmental Psychology•2018

  • Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism

    Open Access•Pilar Aguilar, Silvina Brussino et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  • Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures

    Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021

  • Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making

    Paul Conway, Bertram Gawronski•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae