Perceiving faces through reconnection‐colored glasses after social exclusion
Evidence from N100
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21391972 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Min Zhu (0009-0004-6196-8661, Department of Social Work and Management Nanjing Tech University Nanjing China, corresponding author), Haoyue Qian (0000-0002-1793-6409, Institute of Neuroscience Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China), Pengcheng Zhang (0000-0002-4546-0022, Department of Psychology School of Education Zhejiang International Studies University Hangzhou China), Xiangping Gao (0000-0002-4890-3319, Academic Affairs Office Shanghai Normal University Shanghai China) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-71 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjop.12775 |
| PMID | 34514611 |
| OpenAlex | W3200614885 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
Social exclusion motivates individuals to selectively reconnect with others, in which face categorization plays an important role. However, it remains unknown how reconnection possibility interacts with perception at the very early stage of face categorization. To address this issue, after social exclusion or social inclusion priming, participants were instructed to select one person from two gender‐matched strangers as a future “coworker” (with high reconnection possibility; the left one is a future “stranger,” with low reconnection possibility) for another ostensible task, and then complete an orientation judgment task of self‐face, coworker face and stranger face, with event‐related brain potential (ERP) recordings. Results showed that excluded participants produced larger N100 to future coworker face than to stranger face, but no such difference was found among included participants. Compared with included participants, excluded participants produced significantly larger N100 to future coworker face. Moreover, N100 elicited by future coworker face was significantly negatively correlated with rating scores of exclusion only for social excluded participants. These findings indicate that social reconnection desire may contribute to the biased face perception which facilitates face categorization of socially excluded people
Categorization · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Event-related potential · Face perception · N100 · Perception · Priming (agriculture) · Social exclusion · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Getting a Cue
The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces
On the Outside Looking In
Adaptive Responses to Social Exclusion
Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection
Social Exclusion and Selective Memory
G*Power 3
Ucla Loneliness Scale (Version 3)
Automatic emotion regulation after social exclusion
Impact of group rejections from a physical activity on physical self-esteem among university students
Attitudes influence implicit racial face categorization in a perceptual task
Seeing “us vs. them”
Multiple cues in social perception
The world in black and white
Reaching out by changing what's within
Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception
Race and gender on the brain
"Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem
Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |