Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Strong versus weak embodiment

Spatial iconicity in physical, abstract, and social semantic categories

Bibliographic Data

ID21392046
AuthorsJose A Leon (0000-0002-4082-1992, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Calle Iván Pavlo Madrid Spain), José Ángel Martínez‐Huertas (0000-0002-6700-6832, UNED Calle de Juan del Rosal Madrid Spain), Jonathan D Moreno (0000-0002-4254-7907, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Calle Iván Pavlo Madrid Spain, corresponding author), Lorena A Martín (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Calle Iván Pavlo Madrid Spain), Lorena A Martín-Arnal (0000-0002-6844-7955, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
Year2023
Volume64
Issue5
Pages574-581
Publication date2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.12909
PMID36843286
OpenAlexW4322495267
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited40

BACKGROUND: Perceptual and action systems seem to be related to complex cognitive processes, but the scope of grounded or embodied cognition has been questioned. Zwaan and Yaxley (2003) proposed that cognitive processes of making semantic relatedness judgments can be facilitated when word pairs are presented in ways that their referents maintain their iconic configuration rather than their reverse-iconic configuration (the spatial iconicity effect). This effect has been observed in different semantic categories using specific experiments, but it is known that embodiment is highly dependent on task demands. METHOD: The present study analyzed the spatial iconicity effect in three semantic categories (physical, abstract, and social) using the same experimental criteria to determine the scope of embodied cognition. In this reaction-time experiment, 75 participants judged the semantic relatedness of 384 word pairs whose experimental items were presented in their iconic or reverse-iconic configurations. RESULTS: Two mixed-effects models with crossed random effects revealed that the interaction between word meaning and spatial position was present only for physical concepts but neither for abstract nor social concepts. CONCLUSIONS: Within the framework of strong and weak embodiment theories, the data support weak embodiment theory as the most explicative one

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Embodied cognition · Iconicity · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Perception · Action Observation and Synchronization · Artificial Intelligence · Communication · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

  • Mental Simulation in Sentence Comprehension With Bilingual—Evidence From Linguistic Looming Effect

    Open Access•Yue Wang, Chaojie Deng et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Symbols and EmbodimentDebates on meaning and cognition

    Manuel De Vega, Arthur Glenberg et al.•Symbols and embodiment•2008

  • A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content

    Open Access•Bradford Z Mahon, Alfonso Caramazza•Journal of Physiology-Paris•2008

  • The representation of abstract words

    Stavroula Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2011

  • Action-based language

    Open Access•Arthur Glenberg, Arthur M Glenberg et al.•Cortex•2012

  • Embodiment of abstract concepts

    Daniel Casasanto•Journal of Experimental…•2009

  • Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models

    Open Access•Hannes Matuschek, Reinhold Kliegl et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2017

  • Coming of age

    Open Access•Lotte Meteyard, Sara Rodríguez‐Cuadrado et al.•Cortex•2012

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • The Embodiment of Power as Forward/Backward Movement in Chinese and English Speakers

    Huilan Yang, J Reid et al.•Metaphor and Symbol•2021

  • Model Selection and Model Averaging for Mixed-Effects Models with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items

    José Ángel Martínez‐Huertas, Ricardo Olmos et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2022

  • Pressing the Flesh

    Open Access•Andrew Clark, Andy Clark•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008

  • Grounded Cognition

    Lawrence W Barsalou•Annual Review of Psychology•2007

  • The challenge of abstract concepts

    Anna M Borghi, Ferdinand Binkofski et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae