Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Working Memory Capacity Modulates the Dual Pathways of Semantic Interference and Facilitation in Speech Production

Bibliographic Data

ID21392263
AuthorsYanhong Fang (0009-0003-4491-7849, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Guangxi Normal University/Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology in Guangxi Universities Guilin China), Guanhai Yin (0009-0008-9311-3800, College of Education Jinggangshan University Jian Jiangxi China, corresponding author), Jijia Zhang (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Guangxi Normal University/Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology in Guangxi Universities Guilin China), J B Zhang (0009-0000-9159-0322, Guangxi Normal University)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.70121
PMID42250243
OpenAlexW7163745738
LanguageEN
References cited45

The nature and strength of semantic effects in speech production, often studied using the picture‐word interference (PWI) paradigm, are known to be influenced by object‐level variables such as the type of semantic relationship. However, the role of subject‐level cognitive factors, particularly working memory capacity (WMC), remains largely unexplored. This study investigated how WMC modulates semantic interference from category‐related distractors and facilitation from associative‐related distractors. Participants pre‐screened into high ( n = 29) or low ( n = 29) WMC groups completed two PWI tasks (categorical and associative relations) in a single session. Naming latencies were recorded as the primary measure. For categorical relations, a robust semantic interference effect was observed. Crucially, this interference was significantly stronger in low‐WMC individuals compared to high‐WMC individuals. Conversely, for associative relations, a semantic facilitation effect was found, which was markedly more pronounced in the high‐WMC group than in the low‐WMC group. These findings demonstrate that working memory capacity dynamically regulates the strength of semantic effects without altering their fundamental direction: attenuating interference and enhancing facilitation. This study bridges a critical theoretical gap by incorporating individual differences into the architecture of speech production, demonstrating that WMC is a key moderator shaping the dynamics of lexical access

Associative property · Categorical variable · Cognition · Dual (grammatical number) · Facilitation · Interference (communication) · Semantic memory · Speech production · Working memory · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research

  • A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

    Michael J Kane, M Kathryn Bleckley et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2001

  • The variable nature of cognitive control

    Open Access•Todd S Braver•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2012

  • A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking

    Open Access•Ardi Roelofs•Cognition•1992

  • An automated version of the operation span task

    Open Access•Nash Unsworth, Richard P Heitz et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2005

  • Working memory and language comprehension

    Open Access•Meredyth Daneman, Philip M Merikle•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•1996

  • A theory of lexical access in speech production

    Open Access•Willem J M Levelt, Ardi Roelofs et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1999

  • Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging

    Lynn Hasher, Rose T Zacks•Psychology of Learning and…•1988

  • A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

    Gary S Dell•Psychological Review•1986

  • Working memory and second language comprehension and production

    Open Access•Jared A Linck, Peter Osthus et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2014

  • The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence

    Open Access•Michael J Kane, Randall W Engle•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2002

  • The episodic buffer

    Open Access•Alan Baddeley•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2000

  • Top-down modulation

    Open Access•Adam Gazzaley, Anna C Nobre•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2012

  • A capacity theory of comprehension

    Marcel Adam Just, Patricia A Carpenter•Psychological Review•1992

  • Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties

    Open Access•Barbara Carretti, Erika Borella et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2009

  • Use of the Extreme Groups Approach

    Kristopher J Preacher, Derek D Rucker et al.•Psychological Methods•2005

  • Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention

    Open Access•Randall W Engle•Current Directions in Psychological…•2002

  • The influence of stimulus onset asynchrony on semantic effect in spoken word production

    Yuxi Zhou, Yuhao Liu et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2022

  • Roles of Semantic Similarity and Category Size on Semantic Effect in Picture-Word Interference Paradigm

    Yanhong Fang, Jijia Zhang•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2013

  • The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1973

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae