Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Reality Made Calibratable”

Walther Moede’s Bimanual Tester, Labor Efficiency, and Psychotechnical “Objectivity” in the Weimar Republic

Bibliographic Data

ID21392442
AuthorsAgnes Bauer (University of Potsdam, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue3
Pages315-342
Publication date2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-6978 • E-ISSN: 1420-9144
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00048-025-00425-5
PMID40833429
OpenAlexW4413338240
LanguageEN
References cited34

This article analyzes how industrial psychologists used mechanical devices to study the efficiency of human labor. One major proponent of this research field, commonly known as “Psychotechnik,” was Walther Moede. He invented a so-called bimanual tester—“Zweihandprüfer”—that enabled him to quantify the subjects’ performance in aptitude tests, and then translate these findings into forecasts of future efficiency and productivity. Industrial psychologists interpreted their results as seemingly objective and unbiased indicators of the subjects’ skills which made it possible to allocate workers, employees, and apprentices to their appropriate position within companies. This article, in contrast, argues that the classification of workers and employees was to a certain degree based on the examiners’ qualitative value judgements. Drawing on printed sources such as psychotechnical journals and textbooks as well as experiments of their own with a bimanual tester, the author is able to show how industrial psychologists interpreted, evaluated, and categorized the participants’ aptitude test results. Psychotechnicians claimed scientific authority and, hence, the power to classify individuals as “failures” or “gifted.” While industrial psychologists argue that they were able to rationalize the distribution of work in the 1920s, this article reveals the leeway there is for interpretation when translating allegedly “objective” test results

Apprenticeship · Aptitude · Classical economics · Developmental psychology · Economic growth · Economics · Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy) · Productivity · Test (biology) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · History · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology

  • Arbeitswissenschaft im Nationalsozialismus

    Open Access•Irene Raehlmann•Arbeitswissenschaft Im…•2005

  • The Measure of Merit

    John M Carson, John Carson•Measure of Merit•2007

  • The Oxford Handbook of History and Material Culture

    Ivan Gaskell, Sarah Anne Carter•Oxford Handbook of History and…•2020

  • Zur Psychologie der Aussage

    L William Stern•Zur Psychologie der Aussage•1902

  • Visions of Modernity

    Mary Nolan•Visions of modernity•1994

  • Zwischen Motorik und Kognition. Die Bewertung und Verschiebung menschlicher Leistungsfähigkeit, 1850–1930

    Open Access•Christopher Neumaier•Historische Zeitschrift•2023

  • Theorie der Psychotechnik

    Open Access•Fritz Giese•Theorie der Psychotechnik•1925

  • Trust in Numbers

    Theodore M Porter•Trust in Numbers•1995

  • Trust in Numbers

    Theodore M Porter•Trust in Numbers•1995

  • Professional psychology in Germany, National Socialism, and the Second World War

    Wolfgang Schönpflug•History of Psychology•2017

  • Optimizing the German Workforce

    H Hartmann•German History•2011

  • Industrieller Maschinenbau im 19. Jahrhundert

    Michael Allen, Volker Benad-Wagenhoff et al.•Technology and Culture•1996

  • Between Taylorism and Technocracy

    Open Access•Charles S Maier•Journal of Contemporary History•1970

  • An Object of Vulgar Curiosity

    Heather Wolffram•Journal of the History of…•2012

  • The enlightened microscope

    Open Access•Peter Heering•The British Journal for the…•2008

  • The authority of human nature

    Open Access•John Van Wyhe•The British Journal for the…•2002

  • Recreating Herschel's actinometry

    Open Access•Adelheid Voskuhl•The British Journal for the…•1997

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Insourcing und Outsourcing. Anthropologien der modernen Arbeit

    Open Access•Brigitta Bernet•Historische Anthropologie•2016

  • Leviathan and the Myograph

    Open Access•Henning Schmidgen•Science in Context•2015

  • Weimar Psychotechnics between Americanism and Fascism

    Andreas Killen•Osiris•2007

  • Primordial Haptics, 1925-1935

    Open Access•Max Stadler•Body & Society•2022

  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump

    Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer•Leviathan and the Air-Pump•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae