“Reality Made Calibratable”
Walther Moede’s Bimanual Tester, Labor Efficiency, and Psychotechnical “Objectivity” in the Weimar Republic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392442 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Agnes Bauer (University of Potsdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 315-342 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-6978 • E-ISSN: 1420-9144 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00048-025-00425-5 |
| PMID | 40833429 |
| OpenAlex | W4413338240 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This article analyzes how industrial psychologists used mechanical devices to study the efficiency of human labor. One major proponent of this research field, commonly known as “Psychotechnik,” was Walther Moede. He invented a so-called bimanual tester—“Zweihandprüfer”—that enabled him to quantify the subjects’ performance in aptitude tests, and then translate these findings into forecasts of future efficiency and productivity. Industrial psychologists interpreted their results as seemingly objective and unbiased indicators of the subjects’ skills which made it possible to allocate workers, employees, and apprentices to their appropriate position within companies. This article, in contrast, argues that the classification of workers and employees was to a certain degree based on the examiners’ qualitative value judgements. Drawing on printed sources such as psychotechnical journals and textbooks as well as experiments of their own with a bimanual tester, the author is able to show how industrial psychologists interpreted, evaluated, and categorized the participants’ aptitude test results. Psychotechnicians claimed scientific authority and, hence, the power to classify individuals as “failures” or “gifted.” While industrial psychologists argue that they were able to rationalize the distribution of work in the 1920s, this article reveals the leeway there is for interpretation when translating allegedly “objective” test results
Apprenticeship · Aptitude · Classical economics · Developmental psychology · Economic growth · Economics · Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy) · Productivity · Test (biology) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · History · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology
Arbeitswissenschaft im Nationalsozialismus
The Measure of Merit
The Oxford Handbook of History and Material Culture
Zur Psychologie der Aussage
Visions of Modernity
Zwischen Motorik und Kognition. Die Bewertung und Verschiebung menschlicher Leistungsfähigkeit, 1850–1930
Theorie der Psychotechnik
Trust in Numbers
Trust in Numbers
Professional psychology in Germany, National Socialism, and the Second World War
Optimizing the German Workforce
Industrieller Maschinenbau im 19. Jahrhundert
Between Taylorism and Technocracy
An Object of Vulgar Curiosity
The enlightened microscope
The authority of human nature
Recreating Herschel's actinometry
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
Insourcing und Outsourcing. Anthropologien der modernen Arbeit
Leviathan and the Myograph
Weimar Psychotechnics between Americanism and Fascism
Primordial Haptics, 1925-1935
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |