Between Protest and Counter-Expertise
User Knowledge, Activism, and the Making of Urban Cycling Networks in the Netherlands Since the 1970s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392496 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henk-Jan Dekker (0000-0001-9435-2549, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 281-309 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-6978 • E-ISSN: 1420-9144 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00048-022-00341-y |
| PMID | 35943558 |
| OpenAlex | W4295084068 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
Around 1970, high numbers of traffic casualties among cyclists led to the creation of numerous local protest movements in the Netherlands. While activists employed protest strategies, their main interest lie in the way they exemplify a highly successful instance of “lay expertise”; the idea that users of a technology have a fundamentally different and valuable perspective on a technology than experts or system-builders. Specifically, cyclists claimed to be more knowledgeable about cycling conditions and safety than the state-employed engineers and traffic experts who built the roads and cycling path network. A key actor in this story is the Dutch Cyclists’ Union ( Fietsersbond ), a national platform of local action groups formed in 1975. These activists used the cycling experience of everyday utilitarian cyclists to compile maps and blacklists of locations where cycling was dangerous, unpleasant, uncomfortable, or otherwise discouraging. In doing so, they successfully claimed legitimacy as a valuable knowledge partner for local engineers and policymakers. As a result, they gained some level of influence within local governments, a relation which in the intervening years has only grown stronger. This case study shows how users can shape socio-technical systems bottom-up, and can therefore to an extent be seen as a successful example of co-construction of technology
Action (physics) · Cycling · Legitimacy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Dutch Social and Cultural Studies · Engineering · History · Law · Social Media and Politics
May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide
The Oxford Handbook of Governance
Risk, Environment and Modernity
Sheepfarming after Chernobyl
The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge
Cycling politics
Cycling and recycling
A conceptual history of livability
Making a bicycle city
The Interstates and the Cities
Cycling, modernity and national culture
People and the car
What is the Problem with Experts
The Political Impact of Technical Expertise
For a Decent Quality of Life”
Beneath consensual corporatism
The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies
(Re-) claiming urban streets
The sociotechnical roots of smart mobility
When Cycling Gets Political
Social movement and the failure of car-friendly city projects
Ring Road
Swedish corporatism at a crossroads
Citizen Science and the Politics of Environmental Data
The Construction of Lay Expertise
The rise and decline of national habitus
New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |