Humanistic school science
Research, policy, politics and classrooms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392733 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Glen S Aikenhead (0000-0003-2293-347X, College of Education University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 237-260 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21774 |
| OpenAlex | W4304687458 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 69 |
This article establishes a rational, feasible, and necessary conclusion to reform high school science content into an equitable experience for its wide diversity of students' self‐identities. Research indicates that 85% of graduates would not normally have enrolled in any science course unless required. Their values are more aligned with their everyday world and/or the world of the humanities, to varying degrees. The 15% had already fulfilled their science prerequisite for postsecondary science‐related programs, to varying degrees. The article's conclusion rests mainly on historical and economic evidence, respectively: (1) The Sputnik crisis that instilled public fear and anxiety about the perceived technological gap between the United States and Soviet Union. This led to reforming high school science and implementing National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2) The on‐growing climate‐change crisis for which the smart international money is increasingly investing in sustainable businesses and industries, which catalyze a shift in public values from the current “profit society” to a “sustainable society.” The article's rationale connects the two historical events. Over the past 30 years, the nature of normal science has evolved into post‐normal science. Today the public square also includes: (a) an international assessment project that receives a negative validity audit in this article; (b) a vocal small minority within the 85%, proud of their antiscience self‐identities and their leaders' hostile behavior (a problem to ameliorate by a reformed sustainable science education); and (c) instances of small‐scale, suitable reform examples developed over the last 70 years, often referred to as humanistic school science
Diversity (politics) · Normal science · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Science education · Science, technology, society and environment education · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Law · Public Administration · Science Education and Pedagogy
Culturally Responsive Pedagogical Knowledge
Exploring Science Teachers’ Reflections on Using Identity and Criticality to Design Social Justice-Oriented Environments
Manufacturing authenticity as part of written PBL curriculum
Climate change litigation as a tool for climate change education
A self‐reported instrument to measure and foster students' science connection to life with the Care ‐ KNOW ‐ DO model and open schooling for sustainability
A framework for climate change education in critical geography
How ethical areas of post-normal science can invigorate mathematics education
Science literacy in the twenty-first century
Pisa 2015 Results (Volume I)
Is science me? High school students' identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine
Identity, Goals, and Learning
Status quo bias in decision making
Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
Humanistic science education
Humanistic science education
Science Education is civics education
The potential of “civic science education”
Fostering public trust in science
Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople’s trust in researchers and research
Public perceptions of who counts as a scientist for controversial science
A Realistic Scenario for U.S. R&D
Science | Environment | Health
Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work
Frameworks Supporting Socially Responsible Science Education
School Science and Mathematics Storylines
Neoliberalism and STEM Education
School socio-economic status and student socio-academic achievement goals in upper secondary contexts
Science for the post-normal age
Tangled up in views
Education Culture, Economy, and Society
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |