Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21392758 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Douglas Allchin (0000-0003-4038-5155, Minnesota Center for the Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 261-274 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21746 |
| OpenAlex | W4284898766 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 26 |
| Referências citadas | 52 |
Scientific misinformation and disinformation, proliferating via the internet and social media, are now significant problems. Proposed solutions vary substantially. Here, I describe a set of prospective benchmarks—10 competencies—that seem essential for reorienting science education to address the challenge. They include, first, elements of epistemic motivation, including basic epistemological beliefs about “constructed” knowledge, adopting a posture of respect for empirical evidence, and an understanding of our epistemic dependence on experts. Second, the benchmarks include perspectives and skills in interacting with media sources. These include how to identify experts, how to identify credible gatekeepers, how to recognize deceptive strategies, and how to deal with social networks and technology. Finally, the competencies include self‐regulation, such as acknowledging the cognitive dispositions that bias our thinking (especially about information that challenges our pre‐existing beliefs) and the counter‐balancing role of consensus. I hope that these competency goals can function as a concrete target in guiding discussion of perhaps more complete or more nuanced approaches to the current crisis. With such competencies clearly and explicitly articulated, teachers will be better positioned to develop effective classroom strategies to nurture the relevant competencies
Competence (human resources) · Disinformation · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Function (biology) · Misinformation · Philosophy of science · Set (abstract data type) · Social media · The Internet · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology
Cinco mitos sobre a pesquisa científica em turismo
Scientific communication and scientific literacy for the public perception of the importance of environmental quality for public health
Describing Mechanisms in Covid-19 Media Coverage
Promoting students’ critical evaluation of popular scientific articles
Intellectual humility – an important content-transcendent goal for science education
Third-hand evaluation of science-related information
Navigating Post-truth
Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Reasoning Levels on Pseudoscientific and Scientific Texts
Situation-Specific Purposes and Epistemic Games
How Scientists Perceive NOS and Its Value for Science Communication
Opening the Black Box of Scientific Practices
Sourcing against misinformation
Science education in an age of misinformation
Negotiating Science‐in‐the‐Wild
Epistemic networks and the social nature of public engagement with science
STEM Education With a Focus on Equity and Justice
Developing and evaluating the extended epistemic vigilance framework
The Importance of Science Education, Scientific Knowledge, and Evaluation Strategies for the Successful Detection of Covid‐19 Misinformation
Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet
Stop the spread
Addressing media and information literacy in engineering design education
Preparing students for the modern information landscape and navigating science–technology–society issues
Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information
Justice‐centered STEM education with multilingual learners to address societal challenges
People who have more science education rely less on misinformation—Even if they do not necessarily follow the health recommendations
Conceptual contamination
What Science Is and How It Really Works
The Enigma of Reason
Pisa 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
Trust in Science and the Science of Trust
The Role of Trust in Knowledge
Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation
Misinformation in and about science
Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition
Judging Truth
Complementary Approaches to Teaching Nature of Science
Confirmation Bias
Who Speaks for Science
Students' abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts
Finding the place of argumentation in science education
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Science education in an age of misinformation
Climate Change and YouTube
University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty
Social Empiricism
A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Beliefs about the nature of knowledge shape responses to the pandemic
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
The Undecidable Grounds of Scientific Expertise
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
Experts
The “Gate Keeper
The Handbook of Journalism Studies
Citizens Versus the Internet
"Why People "Don't Trust the Evidence
| Obras citantes distintas | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 8,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 26 |