On the Logical Argument from Natural Evil
A Response to Moore
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21394657 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James P Sterba (0000-0002-4651-7334, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 861-867 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sophia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-1527 • E-ISSN: 1873-930X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11841-024-01031-z |
| OpenAlex | W4400608860 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 11 |
Dwayne Moore’s "A Naturalistic Theodicy for Sterba’s Problem of Natural Evil," (Moore, 2024) provides a detailed critique of my logical argument from evil against the existence of the God of traditional theism. While there have been many critiques of my logical argument against the existence of the God of traditional theism from moral evil to which I have replied (2020b, 2020c, 2021, 2023), there has been only one previous critique that was directed at my logical argument from natural evil (see Jordan, 2023). Accordingly, I welcome this opportunity to show how my logical argument from natural evil works against Moore’s critique
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Natural (archaeology) · Philosophy of religion · Free Will and Agency · History · Medicine · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |