Antitheodicy and the Grading of Theodicies by Moral Offensiveness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21394795 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Franklin (0000-0002-8622-6750, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 563-576 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sophia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-1527 • E-ISSN: 1873-930X |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11841-020-00765-w |
| OpenAlex | W3048476345 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 24 |
Consequentialism · Duty · Economics · Epistemology · Excuse · Immorality · Law and economics · Moral character · Moral evil · Morality · Offensive · Political science · Sociology · Theodicy · Theology · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Law · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
Better Never to Have Been
Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem
A critique of Samuel Shearn's moral critique of theodicies
Why almost all moral critique of theodicies is misplaced
D. Z. Phillips on God and evil
Moral critique and defence of theodicy
Some moral critique of theodicy is misplaced, but not all
Appearance and Reality
Anti-Theodicy
God and gratuitous evil (Part I)
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |