Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dogmatism and perceptual justification

A reason‐theoretic foundation

Bibliographic Data

ID21395063
AuthorsHamid Vahid (0000-0001-9064-0877, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences Tehran Iran, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume61
Issue4
Pages655-668
Publication date2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Southern Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-4283 • E-ISSN: 2041-6962
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjp.12526
OpenAlexW4385806654
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

According to one prominent account of perceptual justification, “dogmatism,” whenever you have perceptual experience as if p , and lack defeaters, you thereby have immediate, prima facie justification for believing that p . The most important challenge is to show how experience can, on its own, provide justification for the belief in its content. Dogmatists often try to meet this challenge by highlighting the phenomenal character of perceptual experience and the mode of presentation of its content and defending their justifying roles by appealing to intuitively plausible examples. What is lacking here, however, is a theoretical framework to sanction and justify those roles going beyond the mere appeal to examples. Finding such a framework is the main goal of this article. I begin by criticizing a prominent response to this challenge, which suggests a composition view of perceptual experience consisting of sensory experiences and seemings. I then highlight the need for a theoretical framework to provide the rationale for the justifying roles that dogmatists allocate to perceptual experience. It is claimed that the framework in question involves the mechanism by which we possess reasons. Adapting the framework to cases where perception functions as a reason, a principled defense of dogmatism is provided

Appeal · Content (measure theory) · Epistemology · Foundation (evidence) · Perception · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics) · Prima facie · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Basic Epistemic Reasons

    Open Access•Marc A Moffett•Ratio•2025

  • The Importance of Being Rational

    Errol Lord•Importance of Being Rational•2018

  • Problems for Dogmatism

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • The Intellectual Given

    John Bengson•Mind•2015

  • Epistemic Partiality in Friendship

    Sarah Stroud•Ethics•2006

  • Skepticism and the Veil of Perception

    Michael Huemer•Skepticism and the Veil of…•2001

  • Why Open-Minded People Should Endorse Dogmatism

    Open Access•Chris Tucker•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • Seemings as sui generis

    Open Access•Bernice Mcallister•Synthese•2018

  • Epistemic Justification

    Michael Bergmann•The Philosophical Review•2004

  • Contemporary theories of knowledge

    John L Pollock•Contemporary theories of knowledge•1999

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae