Ideology Critique

A Deleuzian Case

Bibliographic Data

ID21395204
AuthorsKeunchang Oh (0000-0003-1734-9279, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume60
Issue3
Pages388-412
Publication date2022-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Southern Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-4283 • E-ISSN: 2041-6962
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjp.12438
OpenAlexW3197526856
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

It is well‐known that Gilles Deleuze (and Félix Guattari) are critical of the notion of ideology. However, it is not very clear why they seem to be so dismissive of it. In what follows, I will begin my discussion by showing what Deleuze means by ideology and reconstructing why Deleuze thinks that ideology is a misused concept and that the misuse of the concept warrants its dismissal. In Anti‐Oedipus , the insufficiency or inadequacy of the concept of ideology can be understood in light of the opposition between production and representation. Next, I will show that—in A Thousand Plateaus —this very opposition between production and representation is relaxed in favor of the notion of assemblage. By looking at Althusser’s theory of ideology, I will argue that ideology is not merely a cognitive representation in the sense that it can be considered as having its own material existence. If so, the concept of ideology does not have to be too narrowly conceived. Rather, I propose that Deleuze and Guattari offer a different kind of ideology critique through noology and the critical analysis of microfascism. Finally, I will conclude by arguing that Deleuze is still enacting a novel form of ideology critique despite his dismissal of the very terminology

Aesthetics · Dismissal · Epistemology · Ideology · Opposition (politics) · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics) · Sociology · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

Tools

Open DOI