The science base of renewables
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21401717 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Persoon (0000-0001-9390-5826, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author), P G J Persoon, Rudi Bekkers (0000-0001-7580-2647, Eindhoven University of Technology), R N A Bekkers, Floortje Alkemade (0000-0002-2231-1913, Eindhoven University of Technology) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 158 |
| Pages | 120121 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120121 |
| OpenAlex | W3037245544 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 29 |
Initiatives to foster the development of Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) can benefit from a deep understanding of the science base that underlies such technologies, and especially how that science base differs from that of Fossil Fuel based Energy Technologies (FFETs). This paper investigates both science bases using citations in patents to scientific journals. We find that RETs generally have a more substantial science base and draw on a more diverse set of scientific disciplines. On average, the science on which RETs build is more recent, less applied and is published in journals with a higher WOS Journal Impact Factor. However, for different RETs (e.g., photovoltaics, wind turbines and non-fossil fuels), we observe much more variation across these dimensions than for different FFETs (e.g., combustion and gas turbines). Furthermore, the broad spectrum of sciences on which RETs build largely includes the smaller spectrum on which FFETs build. Based on these findings, we offer several policy recommendations to better stimulate the development of RETs
Broad spectrum · Economics · Environmental economics · Fossil fuel · Manufacturing engineering · Photovoltaic system · Photovoltaics · Renewable energy · Technology development · Wind power · Chemistry · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Environmental Science · Innovation Policy and RD · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research
Will patents with more interdisciplinary scientific knowledge have higher technological impact? Empirical evidence from USPTO patents
Measuring the global and domestic technological impact of Chinese scientific output
Multilayer patent citation networks
Knowledge for a warmer world
Regulatory push-pull and technological knowledge dynamics of circular economy innovation
The diffusion of energy technologies. Evidence from renewable, fossil, and nuclear energy patents
Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation
Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
The stringdist Package for Approximate String Matching
Sectoral patterns of technical change
Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions
Science as a map in technological search
From market fixing to market-creating
Sustainability transitions
Perspectives on Technology
Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations
Comparing Regression Coefficients Across Subsamples
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |