Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Behavioural drivers and barriers for adopting microbial applications in arable farms

Evidence from the Netherlands and Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID21403045
AuthorsAnnika Francesca Tensi, Annika Tensi (0000-0003-3584-7183, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Frederic Ang (0000-0002-2323-7081, Wageningen University & Research), H J van der Fels‐Klerx (0000-0002-7801-394X, Wageningen University & Research), H J van der Fels-Klerx
Year2022
Volume182
Pages121825
Publication date2022-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121825
OpenAlexW4285040436
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited47

Microbial applications contribute to more sustainable agriculture by stimulating plant growth, increasing resistance to pests and diseases and relieving stresses from climate change. To stimulate the adoption of microbial applications, it is important to understand the underlying reasons for farmers' adoption decision. In this article, we investigate the behavioural drivers and barriers associated with the likelihood to adopt microbial applications. We employ the Behaviour Change Wheel and its capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour (COM-B) model. Data were collected via an online survey among 196 Dutch and German arable farmers. We find that trust in microbial applications is an important driver and that lack of knowledge and professional support are barriers for the adoption of microbial applications. On this basis, we recommend three interventions: i) norm creation and enablement, ii) education and learning, and iii) trust building by providing incentives. The acceptance and success of a behavioural intervention depends on the choice of the interventionist. For instance, the role of governmental institutions in enforcing the adoption of microbial applications is perceived as problematic by farmers. Instead, farmers expect advisers and farmer organisations to become active in knowledge transmission and field studies

Agriculture · Arable land · Business · Economics · German · Incentive · Intervention (counseling) · Norm (philosophy) · Political science · Psychological intervention · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Ecology · Marketing · Psychology

  • How Neighbors Influence Rice–Crayfish Integrated System Adoption

    Open Access•Ke Liu, Zhenhong Qi et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • How to advance sustainable healthy food consumption in tourism

    Mohammad Salehi, Salehi Mohammad et al.•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2024

  • Identifying behavior change interventions with deep leverage

    Open Access•Marieke Cornelia Baaken, Bjørn Vollan•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Behavioural drivers of long-term land leasing adoption

    Open Access•Adewale Henry Adenuga, Claire Jack et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Sowing the seeds of change

    Open Access•Marilena Gemtou, Marcel Kornelis et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Smallholder farmers' behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices

    Open Access•Woldegebrial Zeweld, Guido Van Huylenbroeck et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2017

  • Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices

    Open Access•Francois J Dessart, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé et al.•European Review of Agricultural…•2019

  • RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data

    Open Access•Yan Xia, Yanyun Yang•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Information Transmission in Irrigation Technology Adoption and Diffusion

    Open Access•Margarita Genius, Phoebe Koundouri et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•2014

  • Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions

    Open Access•Susan Michie, Dean L Fixsen et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice

    Susan Michie•BMJ Quality & Safety•2005

  • Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review

    Open Access•A Wezel, Marion Casagrande et al.•Agronomy for Sustainable…•2014

  • What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.

    Jose M Cortina•Journal of Applied Psychology•1993

  • Retracted

    Open Access•Temitope O Ojo, Aa Ogundeji et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia

    Open Access•Julius Manda, Makaiko G Khonje et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Capability, opportunity, and motivation

    Open Access•Taylor Jade Willmott, Bo Pang et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • Kicking the Habit

    Open Access•Lieneke Bakker, Jaap Sok et al.•Ecological Economics•2020

  • Pesticide-free but not organic

    Open Access•Niklas Möhring, R Finger•Food Policy•2021

  • Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to perform unsubsidised agri-environmental measures

    Open Access•William F A van Dijk, Anne Marike Lokhorst et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce Sars-CoV-2 transmission

    Open Access•Robert West, Susan Michie et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

Citations per year1.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae