Behavioural drivers and barriers for adopting microbial applications in arable farms
Evidence from the Netherlands and Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21403045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Annika Francesca Tensi, Annika Tensi (0000-0003-3584-7183, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Frederic Ang (0000-0002-2323-7081, Wageningen University & Research), H J van der Fels‐Klerx (0000-0002-7801-394X, Wageningen University & Research), H J van der Fels-Klerx |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 182 |
| Pages | 121825 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121825 |
| OpenAlex | W4285040436 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 47 |
Microbial applications contribute to more sustainable agriculture by stimulating plant growth, increasing resistance to pests and diseases and relieving stresses from climate change. To stimulate the adoption of microbial applications, it is important to understand the underlying reasons for farmers' adoption decision. In this article, we investigate the behavioural drivers and barriers associated with the likelihood to adopt microbial applications. We employ the Behaviour Change Wheel and its capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour (COM-B) model. Data were collected via an online survey among 196 Dutch and German arable farmers. We find that trust in microbial applications is an important driver and that lack of knowledge and professional support are barriers for the adoption of microbial applications. On this basis, we recommend three interventions: i) norm creation and enablement, ii) education and learning, and iii) trust building by providing incentives. The acceptance and success of a behavioural intervention depends on the choice of the interventionist. For instance, the role of governmental institutions in enforcing the adoption of microbial applications is perceived as problematic by farmers. Instead, farmers expect advisers and farmer organisations to become active in knowledge transmission and field studies
Agriculture · Arable land · Business · Economics · German · Incentive · Intervention (counseling) · Norm (philosophy) · Political science · Psychological intervention · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Ecology · Marketing · Psychology
Smallholder farmers' behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices
Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data
Information Transmission in Irrigation Technology Adoption and Diffusion
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice
Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
Retracted
Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia
Capability, opportunity, and motivation
Kicking the Habit
Pesticide-free but not organic
Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to perform unsubsidised agri-environmental measures
Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce Sars-CoV-2 transmission
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |