Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Micro-foundations of digital innovation capability – A mixed method approach to develop and validate a multi-dimensional measurement instrument

Bibliographic Data

ID21403382
AuthorsJulia Kroh (0000-0002-9868-6076, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, corresponding author), Dietfried Globocnik (0000-0001-9934-7933, University of Klagenfurt), Carsten Schultz (0000-0002-5824-2171, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel), Frederike Holdhof (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel), Søren Salomo (0000-0002-2578-3262, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology)
Year2024
Volume198
Pages122942
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnological Forecasting and Social Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-1625 • E-ISSN: 1873-5509
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122942
OpenAlexW4388318344
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited75

Digital innovation refers to the creation or adoption value-adding novelty through the incorporation of digital technology. Digital innovation challenges established product-centric companies whose innovation management capabilities are insufficient to manage the reconfiguration and transformation necessary for digital innovation and technology. Recent research has introduced different concepts of for example, digital readiness, digitalization capabilities, and digital innovation readiness. However, these concepts have two shortcomings for use in practice and empirical research: most concepts are theoretical in nature, with limited empirically validated measures. As such, this study takes a dynamic capability view to synthesize prior literature on the organizational antecedents of digital innovation and develops a framework for the micro-foundations of digital innovation capability. By applying a mixed-method approach, existing concepts are extended through qualitative research and then translated into a multi-dimensional measurement instrument. This multi-item operationalization is then subjected to scale validation using quantitative research methods. The results show that a company's digital innovation capability is founded upon seven micro-foundations – digital focus, digital innovation process, digital mindset, digital innovation network, digital technology capability, data management, and overcoming digital innovation resistance – that facilitate established companies in sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring digital innovation

Data science · Digital transformation · Innovation Management · Knowledge management · Mindset · Novelty · Operationalization · Process (computing) · Process management · Product innovation · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Digital Transformation in Industry · Engineering · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting

  • Technological Turbulence, Circular Economy Practices, and Digitalization as Determinants of Innovative Culture in High‐Growth Firms

    Open Access•José Bocoya‐Maline, Salustiano Martínez‐Fierro et al.•Business Strategy and the…•2026

  • Phygital dynamic capabilities

    Open Access•Ludovica Moi, Gianluca Pusceddu et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • Deconstructing Tensions in the Adoption of Digital Innovation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management

    Open Access•Surajit Bag•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Digital innovation capability and sustainable performance in strategic emerging industries

    Open Access•Weiwei Xu, Weifang Xu et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • What to do when scalar invariance fails

    Herbert W Marsh, Jiesi Guo et al.•Psychological Methods•2018

  • A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations

    Open Access•Timothy R Hinkin•Journal of Management•1995

  • Dynamic capabilities

    Open Access•Kathleen M Eisenhardt, Jeffrey A Martin•Strategic Management Journal•2000

  • Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems

    Open Access•Eero Autio, Erkko Autio et al.•Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal•2018

  • Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks

    Open Access•Kalle Lyytinen, Youngjin Yoo et al.•Information Systems Journal•2016

  • Organizational Culture and Innovation

    Open Access•Thorsten Büschgens, Andreas Bausch et al.•Journal of Product Innovation…•2013

  • Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation

    Open Access•Nicolai J Fo, Nicolai J Foss et al.•Journal of Management•2017

  • Digital innovation

    Open Access•Rajiv Kohli, Nigel P Melville•Information Systems Journal•2019

  • Digital Innovation Management

    Satish Nambisan, Kalle Lyytinen et al.•MIS Quarterly•2017

  • Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World

    Youngjin Yoo, Richard J Boland et al.•Organization Science•2012

  • Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms

    Fredrik Svahn, Lars Mathiassen et al.•MIS Quarterly•2017

  • Analyzing Observed Composite Differences Across Groups

    Open Access•Holger Steinmetz•Methodology•2013

  • Persuasion With Case Studies

    Nicolaj Siggelkow•Academy of Management Journal•2007

  • Digital Transformation and Innovation Management

    Open Access•Francesco Paolo Appio, Federico Frattini et al.•Journal of Product Innovation…•2021

  • Research Commentary —The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation

    Youngjin Yoo, Ola Henfridsson et al.•Information Systems Research•2010

  • Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Building Theories from Case Study Research

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance

    Open Access•William Meredith•Psychometrika•1993

  • Fit indices in covariance structure modeling

    Li‐tze Hu, Li-tze Hu et al.•Psychological Methods•1998

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs

    Open Access•Gilbert A Churchill•Journal of Marketing Research•1979

  • Explicating dynamic capabilities

    Open Access•David J Teece•Strategic Management Journal•2007

  • A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires

    Open Access•Timothy R Hinkin•Organizational Research Methods•1998

  • Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement

    Open Access•James M Lebreton, Jenell L Senter•Organizational Research Methods•2008

  • Making a digital innovator

    Open Access•Rubén Mancha, G Shankaranarayanan•Information Technology and People•2021

  • The digital workplace and its dark side

    Open Access•Elizabeth Marsh, Elvira Pérez-Vallejos et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • How can SMEs successfully navigate Vuca environment

    Open Access•Ciro Troise, Vincenzo Corvello et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Literature review on digitalization capabilities

    Open Access•Alessandro Annarelli, Cinzia Battistella et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • How AI revolutionizes innovation management – Perceptions and implementation preferences of AI-based innovators

    Open Access•John Fuller, Johann Füller et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Structural equation modeling in practice

    James C Anderson, David W Gerbing•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • Measurement invariance conventions and reporting

    Open Access•Diane L Putnick, Marc H Bornstein•Developmental Review•2016

  • The Essentials of Factor Analysis

    J Sherwood Williams, Dennis Child•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1974

  • Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research

    Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp, Jan‐Benedict E M Steenkamp et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1998

  • Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

  • Intraclass correlations

    Patrick E Shrout, Joseph L Flei et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1979

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae