Timber beds, protests and publics

Conflicting meanings of the public interest on Devonshire Street, Sheffield

Bibliographic Data

ID21406470
AuthorsChristopher Maidment (0000-0002-9158-6910, Christopher Maidment is a Lecturer in Planning, University of Reading – Real Estate & Planning, Henley Business School, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6UD, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume92
Issue5
Pages587-614
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTown Planning Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0041-0020 • E-ISSN: 1478-341X
PublisherLiverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3828/tpr.2021.25
OpenAlexW3170162786
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

This paper discusses a case small in scale, but one which raises questions around how different conceptions of what is in the public interest are reconciled in the English regulatory planning system. The case in question is the proposed redevelopment of three 1850s shops in Sheffield’s Devonshire Quarter, traditionally home to independent retailers. The paper illustrates how a small scale planning application can generate national attention, through a range of misunderstandings, conflicting interests and a narrow definition of what constitutes knowledge in English planning. Particular attention is paid to how a different approach to decision-making might have facilitated a compromise solution, through thinking about what is in the public interest at different scales. The core argument is around the need to address how public participation in planning processes can be based on more equitable use of knowledge. This leads to conclusions around how the system can better reconcile multiple interests

Criminology · Media studies · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public interest · Publics · Sociology · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Urban Planning and Governance · Urbanization and City Planning

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access