Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring the Effect of Conversion on the Distribution of Inflectional Suffixes

A Multivariate Corpus Study

Bibliographic Data

ID21408010
AuthorsAlexander Rauhut (Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Englische Philologie , Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin , Germany, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume69
Issue3
Pages267-290
Publication date2021-09-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueZeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0044-2305 • E-ISSN: 2196-4726
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/zaa-2021-2024
OpenAlexW3213881470
LanguageEN
References cited27

Lexical ambiguity in the English language is abundant. Word-class ambiguity is even inherently tied to the productive process of conversion. Most lexemes are rather flexible when it comes to word class, which is facilitated by the minimal morphology that English has preserved. This study takes a multivariate quantitative approach to examine potential patterns that arise in a lexicon where verb-noun and noun-verb conversion are pervasive. The distributions of three inflectional suffixes, verbal - s , nominal - s , and - ed are explored for their interaction with degrees of verb-noun conversion. In order to achieve that, the lexical dispersion, context-dependency, and lexical similarity between the inflected and bare forms were taken into consideration and controlled for in a Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS; Stasinopoulos, M. D., R. A. Rigby, and F. De Bastiani. 2018. “GAMLSS: A Distributional Regression Approach.” Statistical Modelling 18 (3–4): 248–73). The results of a series of zero-one-inflated beta models suggest that there is a clear “uncanny” valley of lexemes that show similar proportions of verbal and nominal uses. Such lexemes have a lower proportion of inflectional uses when textual dispersion and context-dependency are controlled for. Furthermore, as soon as there is some degree of conversion, the probability that a lexeme is always encountered without inflection sharply rises. Disambiguation by means of inflection is unlikely to play a uniform role depending on the inflectional distribution of a lexeme

Context (archaeology) · Inflection · Lexeme · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Noun · Verb · Word order · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · History · Language and cultural evolution · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Ggplot2•2016

  • Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape

    Open Access•Robert A Rigby, D M Stasinopoulos et al.•Applied Statistics•2005

  • Why do human languages have homophones

    Open Access•Sean Trott, Benjamin Bergen•Cognition•2020

  • Practice makes perfect

    Fabian Tomaschek, Benjamin V Tucker et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2018

  • The communicative function of ambiguity in language

    Open Access•Steven T Piantadosi, Harry Tily et al.•Cognition•2011

  • Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora

    Stefan Th Grie•International Journal of Corpus…•2008

  • Homophony and morphology

    Open Access•Ingo Plag, Julia Homann et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2015

  • Phonetic effects of morphology and context

    Open Access•Fabian Tomaschek, Ingo Plag et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae