Public–pastoralist perception gaps in valuing pastoralism
Implications for its sustainability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21408673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | F Javier Pérez-Barbería (0000-0001-7513-5418, Universidad de Oviedo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AMBIO (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0044-7447 • E-ISSN: 1654-7209 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-026-02401-2 |
| PMID | 42056704 |
| OpenAlex | W7158783759 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
Pastoralism remains vital to Mediterranean landscapes and cultural heritage; yet, pastoralists increasingly doubt how far society accepts and values their activity. Using a nationwide survey of the Spanish public, I examined social attitudes toward pastoralism and compared them with recent surveys of pastoralists in the same region. I found that rural background and older age are associated with more favorable views of pastoral and other extensive livestock systems, while intensive systems are viewed least favorably. The public reports declining social appreciation of pastoralism over time, but relatively infrequent conflict and low concern about externalities. In contrast, pastoralists perceive strong urban intolerance and a widespread loss of social esteem. This comparison reveals that citizens are more accepting of pastoralism than pastoralists believe. I highlight this crucial perception gap and identify communication, policy, and governance measures that support the long-term sustainability of the largest pastoralist system of Europe. Graphical abstract
Corporate governance · Cultural diversity · Livestock · Pastoralism · Perception · Sustainability · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Rural development and sustainability
Governing the Commons
Modern Applied Statistics with S
How to Interpret Statistical Models Using marginaleffects for R and Python
Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
Human behavior in the context of low-probability high-impact events
Addressing the challenge of wildlife conservation in urban landscapes by increasing human tolerance for wildlife
The Logic of Practice
Intensive Livestock Farming and Residential Health
Contrasting perspectives on the risks of intensive livestock farming in The Netherlands
A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services
Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality
Spanish women pastoralists' pathways into livestock management
Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency
Sustainability labels on food products
Social Capital and the Environment
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators
Does re-wilding contribute to biodiversity conservation in Mediterranean cultural landscapes
Traditional herders’ perception of job satisfaction and integration into society
Examining the effects of emotional and cognitive desensitization to community violence exposure in male adolescents of color
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory
Bad is Stronger than Good
| Highly cited | No |
|---|