Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agent-Relative Reasons as Second-Order Value Responses

Bibliographic Data

ID21409024
AuthorsJörg Löschke (0000-0003-2378-6766, University of Zurich, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume50
Issue4
Pages477-491
Publication date2020-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-5091 • E-ISSN: 1911-0820
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/can.2020.3
OpenAlexW3013038954
LanguageEN
References cited62

Agent-relative reasons are an important feature of any nonconsequentialist moral theory. Many authors think that they cannot be accommodated within a value-first theory that understands all value as agent-neutral. In this paper, I offer a novel explanation of agent-relative reasons that accommodates them fully within an agent-neutral value-first view. I argue that agent-relative reasons are to be understood in terms of second-order value responses: when an agent acts on an agent-relative reason, she responds appropriately to the agent-neutral value of her own appropriate response to some agent-neutral value. This view helps reconcile important elements of deontology and consequentialism

Consequentialism · Deontological ethics · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Intrinsic value (animal ethics) · Order (exchange) · Positive economics · Relative value · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Value, Reality, and Desire

    Graham Oddie•Value, reality, and desire•2005

  • Commonsense ConsequentialismWherein Morality Meets Rationality

    Douglas W Portmore•Commonsense consequentialism•2011

  • Confusion of Tongues

    Stephen Finlay•Confusion of Tongues•2014

  • The Strike of the Demon

    Włodek Rabinowicz, Toni Rønnow‐rasmussen•Ethics•2004

  • Love as a Moral Emotion

    J David Velleman•Ethics•1999

  • Fittingness First

    Conor Mchugh, Jonathan Way•Ethics•2016

  • Defending Associative Duties

    Jonathan Seglow•Defending Associative Duties•2013

  • Value, reasons and the structure of justification

    Ross Crisp•Analysis•2005

  • Why am I My Brother’s Keeper?

    Donald H Regan•Reason and value•2004

  • The Truth in Particularism

    Joseph Raz•Moral Particularism•2000

  • Value, Respect, and Attachment

    Open Access•Joseph Raz, Raz Joseph•Value, Respect, and Attachment•2001

  • Explaining Reasons

    Open Access•Ulrike Heuer•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2006

  • Slaves of the Passions

    Mark Schroeder•Slaves of the Passions•2007

  • What We Owe to Each Other

    T M Scanlon, Thomas Scanlon•What We Owe to Each Other•2000

  • The Morality of Freedom

    Joseph Raz•The morality of freedom•1988

  • A Fault Line in Ethical Theory

    Open Access•Shyam Nair•Philosophical Perspectives•2014

  • Kamm on Inviolability and Agent-Relative Restrictions

    Open Access•Kasper Lippert‐rasmussen, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2009

  • Philosophical explanations

    Ezra Talmor•History of European Ideas•1986

  • Friendship and Reasons of Intimacy

    Diane Jeske•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001

  • Virtue, Vice, and Value

    Thomas Hurka•Virtue, vice, and value•2001

  • Reasons, Values and Agent-Relativity

    Open Access•Richard Jay Wallace•dialectica•2010

  • Personal Value

    Toni Rønnow‐rasmussen, Toni Ronnow-Rasmussen•Personal value•2011

  • Impassioned Belief

    Martin Ridge, Michael Ridge•Impassioned Belief•2014

  • The Value-Based Theory of Reasons

    Open Access•Barry Maguire•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2016

  • Wrong Kind of Reasons and Consequences

    Open Access•Richard Rowland, RACH-COSKER ROWLAND•Utilitas•2013

  • Fittingness and Idealization

    Antti Kauppinen•Ethics•2014

  • The Rejection of Consequentialism

    Samuel Scheffler•Rejection of Consequentialism•1984

  • British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing

    Thomas Hurka•British Ethical Theorists from…•2014

  • The Right Kind of Solution to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem

    Open Access•Gerald Lang•Utilitas•2008

  • Knowing What To Do

    Timothy Chappell•Knowing What to Do•2014

  • Intricate Ethics

    F M Kamm•Intricate ethics•2007

  • Buck-Passing and the Right Kind of Reasons

    Włodek Rabinowicz, Toni Rønnow‐rasmussen et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•2006

  • Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella

    Jennie Lousie•The Philosophical Quarterly•2004

  • Thinking About Reasons

    Jonas Olson•The Philosophical Quarterly•2014

  • Buck-Passing Accounts of Value

    Open Access•Jussi Suikkanen•Philosophy Compass•2009

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae