Supererogation, Suberogation, and Maximizing Expected Choiceworthiness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21409045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leora Urim Sung (0000-0002-5160-9671, University College London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 418-432 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-5091 • E-ISSN: 1911-0820 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/can.2024.34 |
| OpenAlex | W4404291357 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 21 |
Recently, several philosophers have argued that, when faced with moral uncertainty, we ought to choose the option with the maximal expected choiceworthiness (MEC). This view has been challenged on the grounds that it is implausibly demanding. In response, those who endorse MEC have argued that we should take into account the all-things-considered choiceworthiness of our options. I argue that this gives rise to another problem: acts that we consider to be supererogatory are rendered impermissible, and acts that we consider to be suberogatory are rendered obligatory, under MEC. I suggest a way to reformulate MEC to solve this problem
Contemporary philosophy · Economics · Epistemology · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |