On Photos and Drawings in Baby Books. A Comparison Based on Dining Scenes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21409102 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bettina Kümmerling‐meibauer (0000-0003-0068-5575, University of Tübingen), Jörg Meibauer (0000-0002-0909-9487, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 443-464 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children s Literature in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-6713 • E-ISSN: 1573-1693 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10583-023-09542-y |
| OpenAlex | W4388681160 |
| Language | EN |
This article offers a comparative analysis of the aesthetic functions of photos vs. drawings in baby books. Baby books are understood as books for children between 0 and 3 years of age. Since the development of food intake and eating behavior is very important at this age, appropriate pictures of dining scenes can be found in many baby books. This article compares picturebooks for babies that show dining scenes, with two photo books, Trine kan... (1955) and Se hvad vi kan! (1964), and two baby books with drawings, The Picturebook for BABY (1950) and I See (1985). The null hypothesis is that photos tend more towards documentary, authentic, and objective representation, while drawings emphasize a stereotypical, expressive, and subjective perspective. Important intermittent factors are the concept of portraiture, expressed cuteness, and the position on a scale from avant-garde to kitsch. The analysis of the images and the accompanying texts (including the peritexts) shows that the representation of babies is subject to historical changes, which is related to different constructions of what it means to be a baby. In particular, the orientation towards parental or pedagogical ideals influences the respective representations
Aesthetics · Art · Kitsch · Perspective (graphical) · Picture books · Representation (politics) · Subject (documents) · Visual arts · Art Education and Development · Computer Science · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Visual Culture and Art Theory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |