Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Heroines and Mothers

Female Representation in the Carnegie Medal Winners 1936–2020

Bibliographic Data

ID21409253
AuthorsMette Lindahl-Wise (0000-0002-6046-3360, Goldsmiths University of London, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume55
Issue4
Pages627-644
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren s Literature in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-6713 • E-ISSN: 1573-1693
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10583-023-09527-x
OpenAlexW4378627738
LanguageEN
References cited17

This article presents quantitative research into the representations of females in Carnegie Medal-winning books 1936–2020. The relative presence or absence of female protagonists (heroines) and their mothers are used as proxies for gauging whether the representation of females is equitable. The research shows male protagonists outnumber female ones by a ratio of 1.58. Further, adult females are underrepresented in the narratives, as only 42% feature mothers who are alive and present in the story. Mothers are even underrepresented in fictional lone-parent families. While there is a strong correlation between female authors and female characters, the bias against fictional females is pronounced and so pervasive that it may signal a ‘symbolic annihilation’ of females in this particular cultural product. Societal changes and realities appear to have been slow to manifest in the Carnegies and a bias against females has not been attenuated even in recent years. Reflecting the diversity of lived experience in books is essential, and it is imperative that readers, including girls, are offered opportunities for identification—not only with protagonists but also adult females who might serve as role models to help them navigate towards adulthood

Art · Art history · Developmental psychology · Diversity (politics) · Literature · Male female · Medal · Narrative · Political science · Representation (politics) · Sociology · Anthropology · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Gender Studies in Language · History · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology

  • Gender Differences in the Choice of Major

    Caitlin Porter, Catherine Porter et al.•American Economic Journal Applied…•2020

  • Understanding Sexual Objectification

    Open Access•Laura Vandenbosch, Steven Eggermont•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Gender Stereotypes in Children's Books

    Sharyl Bender Peterson, Mary Alyce Lach•Gender and Education•1990

  • Learning to Be Little Women and Little Men

    Open Access•Amanda B Diekman, Sarah K Murnen•Sex Roles•2004

  • Gender Stereotyping and Under-representation of Female Characters in 200 Popular Children’s Picture Books

    Open Access•Mykol C Hamilton, Dean P Anderson et al.•Sex Roles•2006

  • Gender Role Stereotyping of Parents in Children?s Picture Books

    Open Access•David A Anderson, Mykol Hamilton et al.•Sex Roles•2005

  • Gender role stereotyping in children's literature

    Open Access•Carole M Kortenhaus, Jack Demarest•Sex Roles•1993

  • The Effect of Character Sex on Story Interest and Comprehension in Children

    Open Access•Mary Ellen Bleakley, Virginia Westerberg et al.•American Educational Research…•1988

  • Gender in Twentieth-Century Children's Books

    Open Access•Janice Mccabe, Emily Fairchild et al.•Gender & Society•2011

  • Mothers' Time, the Parenting Package, and Links to Healthy Child Development

    Open Access•P Fomby, Kelly Musick•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae