Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Appraising Evidence Claims

Bibliographic Data

ID21423468
AuthorsDavid Gough (0000-0003-2732-0402, EPPI-Centre, University College London, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume45
Issue1
Pages1-26
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Research in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-732X • E-ISSN: 1935-1038
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/0091732x20985072
OpenAlexW3155242490
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited29

For research evidence to inform decision making, an appraisal needs to be made of whether the claims are justified and whether they are useful to the decisions being made. This chapter provides a high level framework of core issues relevant to appraising the “fitness for purpose” of evidence claims. The framework includes (I) the variation in the nature of research, the evidence claims it produces, and in the values, perspectives, and ethical issues that underlie it; (II) the main components of the bases of evidence claims in terms of (i) how relevant evidence has been identified and synthesized to make a claim, (ii) the technical quality and relevance of the included evidence, and (iii) the totality of evidence to justify the warrant of the evidence claim (including the potential for there to be alternative explanations); (III) evidence standards to appraise evidence claims and examples of guides and tools to assist with aspects of such appraisal; and (IV) engagement with evidence: (i) the communication of evidence claims, (ii) the fitness for purpose of these evidence claims for decision makers, and (iii) and the interpretation of such claims to provide recommendations and guidance

Alternative medicine · Critical appraisal · Economics · Empirical evidence · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Evidence-based medicine · Evidence-based practice · Interpretation (philosophy) · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Relevance (law) · Warrant · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Medicine · Psychology

  • Enabling knowledge brokerage intermediaries to be evidence-informed

    Open Access•David Gough, Christopher Maidment et al.•Evidence & Policy•2021

  • Bildung im digitalen Wandel. Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien

    Open Access•null :null, Annika Wilmers et al.•Bildung im digitalen Wandel.…•2022

  • Bildung im digitalen Wandel

    Open Access•Rudolf Kammerl•DDS – Die Deutsche Schule•2019

  • A narrative review of research-informed teaching practice in teacher education

    Open Access•Stephen Macgregor, Eric Xie•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Facilitating Research-Informed Educational Practice for Inclusion. Survey Findings From 147 Teachers and School Leaders in England

    Open Access•Chris Brown, Stephen Macgregor et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • Teachers trust educational science - Especially if it confirms their beliefs

    Open Access•Kirstin Schmidt, Tom Rosman et al.•Frontiers in Education•2022

  • Visitors’ Assessment and Utilization of Evidence-Based Program Resources (EBPR) Websites

    Miranda J Lee-Easton, Stephen Magura et al.•Substance Use & Misuse•2022

  • How educational leaders can maximise the social capital benefits of inter-school networks

    Open Access•Chris Brown, Ruth Luzmore et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • Can early intervention for maths anxiety predict better affective and attainment outcomes at primary level? A systematic review

    Úna Shore, Sinéad Kelleher•Irish Educational Studies•2024

  • Characteristics of mandates for evidence-based behavioral health interventions in 8 selected US states

    Open Access•Archer Lee-Easton, Michael Maranda et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2025

  • Philosophy programs in prison and rehabilitative outcomes – A scoping review

    Isabel Gois, Eddie Kane et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2026

  • What works” registries of interventions to improve child and youth psychosocial outcomes

    Open Access•Nick Axford, Louise Morpeth et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2022

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Rameses publication standards

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•BMC Medicine•2013

  • Grade

    Open Access•Gordon H Guyatt, Gordon Guaytt et al.•BMJ•2008

  • Amstar 2

    Open Access•Beverley J Shea, Barnaby C Reeves et al.•BMJ•2017

  • Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

    Open Access•Iain Chalmers, P Glasziou•The Lancet•2009

  • Robis

    Open Access•Penny Whiting, Jelena Savović et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2016

  • What counts as research

    Lawrence Stenhouse•British Journal of Educational…•1981

  • Systems thinking, knowledge and action

    Allan Best, Bev Holmes•Evidence & Policy•2010

  • Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate

    Open Access•David Gough, Diana Elbourne•Social Policy and Society•2002

  • Weight of Evidence

    David Gough•Research Papers in Education•2007

  • The Many Meanings of Research Utilization

    CAROL H WEISS•Public Administration Review•1979

Citations per year1.71
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae