Oppenheimer’s tragedy—and ours
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21428154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Jay Lifton (Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 216-220 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0096-3402 • E-ISSN: 1938-3282 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00963402.2023.2223073 |
| OpenAlex | W4384469680 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
In 1954, Robert Oppenheimer was subjected to what was rightly called “an extraordinary American inquisition” under the name of a security hearing. Despite having served his country so devotedly in heading the atomic bomb project at Los Alamos, he was now publicly humiliated, condemned as a security risk, stripped of his security clearance, and forced to step down from his government consultancies. Those hearings were skewed and manipulated in McCarthyite fashion. But while extremely harmful professionally and personally, the hearings were not Oppenheimer’s greatest tragedy. His greatest tragedy was the success of his leadership in the creation of the weapon. His remarkable gifts as a physicist and as a human being were most realized in the building of a weapon that could lead to the destruction of humankind. We should make Oppenheimer’s legacy to us the recognition that our only form of what has been called “nuclear ethics” is abolition
Government (linguistics) · Heading (navigation) · Manhattan project · National security · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Tragedy (event) · Engineering · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |