An ambitious arms control agenda requires a new organization equal to the task
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21428293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James E Goodby (Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author), David A Koplow |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-10 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0096-3402 • E-ISSN: 1938-3282 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00963402.2020.1859858 |
| OpenAlex | W3124250351 |
| Language | EN |
An exceedingly challenging agenda of urgent, important, and diverse arms control issues awaits the incoming Biden administration. To address it, the administration should consider the creation of a new agency to focus on cooperative threat reduction; alternatively, deft reorganization of key elements of the executive branch could be pursued swiftly, without requiring legislation. An examination of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency’s impressive record of accomplishments (and some failures) between 1961 and 1999, when it was disestablished, can help identify some ideas and options for its potential successor today
Administration (probate law) · Agency (philosophy) · Arms control · Business · Control (management) · Disarmament · Economics · Law and economics · Legislation · Management · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Successor cardinal · Task (project management) · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |