Factors Associated With Resilience in People With Diabetes During the Social Distancing Period Imposed by the Covid-19 Pandemic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21433108 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jaciely Gondim Sidrônio de Lucena (0000-0002-2363-9507, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande), Thaysa Fernandes de Azevedo (0000-0001-7866-2213, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande), Lucas David Maia Matias (0000-0003-1702-7077, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande), Waleska de Brito Nunes (0000-0002-3492-1380, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Brasil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil), Marta Miriam Lopes Costa (0000-0002-2119-3935, Universidade Federal da Paraíba), Lidiane Lima de Andrade (0000-0003-1015-9237, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0104-0707 • E-ISSN: 1980-265X |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2021-0215 |
| OpenAlex | W4293177320 |
| SciELO | S0104-07072022000100321 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 19 |
Objective: to verify the association of socioeconomic and clinical data and behavioral habits with the resilience level in people with Diabetes Mellitus during social distancing in the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus disease. Method: a cross-sectional, analytical and exploratory study. The population consisted of users monitored in the Family Health Strategy, diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus, in the municipality of Cuité, Paraíba, Brazil. The sample consisted of 300 participants. The data were collected between November 2020 and February 2021 and operationalized through two forms: one containing socioeconomic and clinical aspects, as well as behavioral habits; and another that was part of the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale for Brazil, consisting of 25 items divided into four factors, namely: tenacity, adaptability, tolerance, dependence on external support, and intuition. In the bivariate analysis, the Pearson's Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were performed, and the prevalence ratio was calculated, along with the respective 95% confidence intervals. Finally, Poisson Regression with robust variance was applied. Results: the prevalence of having high resilience levels was 43% higher in people under 60 years old, 39% higher in Evangelicals, 36% higher in people who consumed alcoholic beverages and 29% higher in people who practiced some physical activity. Conclusion: an association was evidenced between socioeconomic/clinical data and behavioral habits and a high resilience level; such findings lead to the elaboration of inclusive actions during the pandemic, especially considering the emotional and social aspects, in order to suggest the creation of care strategies aimed at mental health
Bivariate analysis · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Environmental health · Infectious disease (medical specialty) · Pandemic · Population · Psychological resilience · Social distance · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Demography · Health, Nursing, Elderly Care · Medicine · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology · Gerontology
The Mental Health Benefits of Physical Activity in Older Adults Survive the Covid-19 Pandemic
Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with Covid-19 in China
Covid-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly
Religiousness/Spirituality, Resilience and Burnout in Employees of a Public Hospital in Brazil
Stressful Life Events and Resilience During the Covid-19 Lockdown Measures in Italy
Alcohol Consumption during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Mental Health and Work Attitudes among People Resuming Work during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Psychological resilience, depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms in response to Covid-19
Covid-19
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |