Formens makt og materialitet

The article argues that in the emerging field of the history of knowledge, with its focus on the production, circulation and exchange of knowledge, explorations of forms will represent a valuable addition. Form is related to genre. Yet, while the identification of genres is largely based on linguistic, literary or rhetorical criteria, form is also about structures and materiality as well as about practical and institutional preconditions. Form often attracts less attention than contents, although the form makes this content recognizable as knowledge. Our argument builds on the exploration of two different early modern knowledge forms, the catechism and the ship's log respectively. Both demonstrate how form is decisive in defining contents as authoritative knowledge. They also illustrate how form is a prerequisite to enable knowledge to circulate and be part of cultural exchange, and thus to be socially efficient. The forms serve to codify existing knowledge, but also to the production and circulation of new insights. When forms like the log and the catechism are examined historically, however, they can also be seen to live their own lives in a tension between stability and change. The forms themselves become objects of negotiations, change and innovation

Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis) · Catechism · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Focus (optics) · Knowledge management · Knowledge production · Linguistics · Materiality (auditing) · Negotiation · Political science · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Renaissance and Early Modern Studies · Rhetoric and Communication Studies