Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Protection from interference by a retro-cue in a visual working memory task

Bibliographic Data

ID21435763
AuthorsJohn Solórzano-Restrepo (0000-0001-9008-0013, Texas Christian University Department of Psychology), Kenneth J Leising (0000-0003-1527-3311, Texas Christian University Department of Psychology)
Year2024
Volume56
Pages156-163
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista Latinoamericana de Psicología (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0120-0534
PublisherFundacion Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (PUBLISHER • CO)
DOI10.14349/rlp.2024.v56.16
OpenAlexW4402290356
LanguageEN
References cited29

Introduction: Working memory for one property (e.g., colour) of a recently viewed object is enhanced by repeated presentation of a cue (e.g., an arrow) to remember that property before (pre-cueing) or after (retro-cueing) viewing the object. While an added cue can enhance memory, selective interference of memory can occur when an added stimulus competes for working memory processing of one property (e.g., colour) of an object more than another (e.g., location of the object). The current experiment investigated whether adding a cue, trained as a pre-cue, after the target but before a distractor stimulus will improve or interfere with memory of the target in a visuo-spatial change detection task. Method: Test trials followed the structure: coloured background (CB1), target stimulus, coloured background (CB2), distractor, and probe stimulus. Young adults (n = 22) were instructed that the colour of CB1 would signal whether to respond “same” or “different” based on the match of the identity (e.g., green) or the location (e.g., yellow) of the probe stimulus to the target stimulus. During the test, the property signalled by the colour of CB2 could be either the same as CB1, neutral, or incongruent. Control trials included the same novel colour (e.g., blue) as CB1 and CB2. Results: An analysis of d’ revealed significantly better performance during trials with CBs that signalled the need to remember the same property before the target and distractor. Conclusions: Results support the hypothesis of protection from interference by a retro-cue

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Interference (communication) · Interference theory · Task (project management) · Telecommunications · Visual short-term memory · Working memory · Communication · Computer Science · Engineering · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Neuroscience · Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms

  • Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations

    Open Access•Ivan C Griffin, Anna C Nobre•Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience•2003

  • The Negative Priming Effect

    Open Access•Steven P Tipper•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1985

  • Priming of pop-out

    Open Access•Vera Maljkovic, Ken Nakayama•Memory & Cognition•1994

  • Working memory

    Open Access•Alan Baddeley•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2003

  • PsychoPy2

    Open Access•Jonathan Peirce, Jonathan W Peirce et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues

    Open Access•Markus Janczyk, Heiko Reuss•Consciousness and Cognition•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae