Power & Moral Capital - a 'Theory Of Access' For People Receiving Public Assistance In Rural Usa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2144081 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Candace K May (0000-0001-6029-8943, Sociology & Rural Studies, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA, corresponding author), Julie Yingling (0000-0003-0694-1007, Lycoming College) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 334-356 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0253 • E-ISSN: 1533-8525 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00380253.2024.2321889 |
| OpenAlex | W4392380592 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
In-depth interviews with people using public assistance in a rural place in the United States demonstrated barriers to accessing resources through formal work and self-provisioning and the ability to benefit from use of public assistance—low income means-tested medical, nutritional, financial, or other services from state, federal, or non-governmental agencies. The Theory of Access (TOA) was used as a framework to organize participant narratives and an intersectional perspective to a multidimensional theory of power was used to demonstrate how moral capital is levied and reproduced. Findings from the TOA revealed intersectionalities in barriers to accessing resources across structural, relational, physical, and psychosocial access mechanisms for women, particularly women of color with dependent children, pregnant women of color, and women with disabilities. While TOA demonstrated need for public assistance, the double power of moral capital demonstrated how the benefits of public assistance to human dignity and welfare were reduced by (1) disciplinary tactics to reject public assistance and (2) reproduction of broader moral imperatives. The connections between TOA and moral capital contribute an intersectionality approach for understanding the multiple disadvantages of people with the lowest incomes, which helps to explain low rates of self-provisioning and public assistance use despite high need across the rural Global North
Business · Dignity · Economics · Grounded theory · Intersectionality · Political science · Provisioning · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Gender Studies · Homelessness and Social Issues
Making Ends Meet
Rural Communities
Ethnography and human development
Community and Resource Extraction in Rural America
Framing Rural Studies in the Global North
Dividing Paradise
Fixing a Leaky U.S. Social Safety Net
The Child Welfare System and State Intervention in Families
Access to Ecosystem Benefits
Access to Natural Resources on Private Property
Accessing food resources
Exploring the social bases of home gardening
Social inequalities in rural England
Still bleeding
Rural-urban variation in informal work activities in the United States
Russian poverty
Food Self-Provisioning in Czechia
The Cost of Free Assistance
Surviving the Great Recession
Food Self‐provisioning in Europe
Welfare Law, Welfare Fraud, and the Moral Regulation of the 'Never Deserving' Poor
Economic Restructuring, Household Strategies, and Gender
Coping with Rural Poverty
A Social Structure of Many Souls
Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Snowball Sampling
Governing Resilience through Power
A Theory of Access
Household Economic Behavior in Post-Socialist Rural Hungary
Identifying Participation in the Informal Economy Using Survey Research Methods1
Complicating the triangle of race, class and state
| Highly cited | No |
|---|