Improving our understanding of open access
How it relates to funding, internationality of research and scientific leadership
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21441797 |
|---|---|
| Authors | María Bordons (0000-0002-1646-6804, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, corresponding author), Borja González‐Albo (0000-0002-9330-8121, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), L Moreno-Solano (0009-0004-9511-0428, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 4651-4676 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-023-04726-1 |
| OpenAlex | W4382927884 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 47 |
As open publication has become a goal in scholarly communication, interest in how it relates to other features of the research process has grown. This paper focuses on the relationship between funding and open access (OA) in the Spanish National Research Council’s Web of Science publications in three scientific fields with different research practices, namely, Biology & Biomedicine (BIOL), Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and Materials Science (MATE). Firstly, the three fields are characterised in relation to OA practices (OA status and OA routes) and acknowledged funding (funding status and funding origin). Secondly, the relationship between OA and funding is explored, and the role of additional influential factors, such as the internationality of research and national/foreign leadership of papers, is unravelled through logistic regression. BIOL shows a higher OA share (66%) than do the other two fields (around 33%). Funded research shows higher OA rates than unfunded research in the experimental fields, but not in HSS, where it is related to a shift towards more publications with article-processing charges. The internationality of research, measured through international collaboration or foreign funding, increases OA, albeit with differences across fields. Foreign-funded papers are more likely to be led by foreign researchers in all three fields, but a foreign first author increases the chances of OA publication in HSS only, perhaps because Spanish leaders in this field have not internalised the importance of OA. The research’s policy implications are reviewed
Biology · Biomedicine · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · Public relations · Science policy · Scientometrics · Social science · Sociology · Web of science · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Law · Public Administration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
The state of OA
Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications
How open science helps researchers succeed
The International Development of Open Access Publishing
Scrutinising what Open Access Journals Mean for Global Inequalities
Drivers of article processing charges in open access
Measuring open access publications
The practical implementation of open access policies and mandates in Spanish public universities
Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact
Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact
Article processing charges
Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system
Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |