Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An analysis of the relationship between access models and retractions with peer review issues (2014–2024)

Bibliographic Data

ID21442024
AuthorsJorge Mañana-Rodríguez (0000-0002-0717-5271, National Research Council, corresponding author), Begoña Granadino (0000-0002-0144-8638), Begoña Granadino-Goenechea (National Research Council), Núria Bautista‐Puig (0000-0003-2404-0683), Nuria Bautista-Puig (National Research Council)
Year2026
Volume131
Issue6
Pages4151-4173
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-026-05668-0
OpenAlexW7162631662
LanguageEN
References cited62

Bibliometrics · Discipline · Independence (probability theory) · Peer review · Publishing · Reliability (semiconductor) · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Authorship Attribution and Profiling

  • The ASA Statement on p -Values

    Ronald L Wasserstein, Ron Wasserstein et al.•The American Statistician•2016

  • Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

    Open Access•Jeffrey Beall•Nature•2012

  • Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

    Open Access•Ferric C Fang, R Grant Steen et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Peer Review

    Open Access•Richard Smith•Proceedings of the Royal Society…•2006

  • Influence of accessibility (open and toll-based) of scholarly publications on retractions

    Open Access•Tariq Ahmad Shah, Sumeer Gul et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors

    Open Access•Bakthavachalam Elango•Scientometrics•2021

  • Market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals

    Open Access•Sumiko Asai•Scientometrics•2020

  • Retractions in primary care journals (2000–2022)

    Open Access•Paul Sebo•Scientometrics•2023

  • Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020

    Open Access•Kiran Sharma•Scientometrics•2021

  • Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus

    Open Access•Jack H Culbert, Anne Hobert et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills

    Open Access•Adam Day•Scientometrics•2022

  • The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases

    Open Access•José-Luis Ortega, Lorena Delgado-Quirós•Scientometrics•2024

  • The oligopoly’s shift to open access

    Open Access•Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews

    Open Access•K Bell, Patricia Kingori et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae