Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Link-based approach to study scientific software usage

The case of VOSviewer

Bibliographic Data

ID21442233
AuthorsEnrique Orduña‐Malea (0000-0002-1989-8477, Universitat Politècnica de València, corresponding author), Rodrigo Costas Comesana (0000-0002-7465-6462, Leiden University)
Year2021
Volume126
Issue9
Pages8153-8186
Publication date2021-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y
OpenAlexW3179665030
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited39

Scientific software is a fundamental player in modern science, participating in all stages of scientific knowledge production. Software occasionally supports the development of trivial tasks, while at other instances it determines procedures, methods, protocols, results, or conclusions related with the scientific work. The growing relevance of scientific software as a research product with value of its own has triggered the development of quantitative science studies of scientific software. The main objective of this study is to illustrate a link-based webometric approach to characterize the online mentions to scientific software across different analytical frameworks. To do this, the bibliometric software VOSviewer is used as a case study. Considering VOSviewer’s official website as a baseline, online mentions to this website were counted in three different analytical frameworks: academic literature via Google Scholar (988 mentioning publications), webpages via Majestic (1,330 mentioning websites), and tweets via Twitter (267 mentioning tweets). Google scholar mentions shows how VOSviewer is used as a research resource, whilst mentions in webpages and tweets show the interest on VOSviewer’s website from an informational and a conversational point of view. Results evidence that URL mentions can be used to gather all sorts of online impacts related to non-traditional research objects, like software, thus expanding the analytical scientometric toolset by incorporating a novel digital dimension

Data science · Dimension (graph theory) · Point (geometry) · Product (mathematics) · Relevance (law) · Scientific literature · World Wide Web · Computer Science · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Software · Web visibility and informetrics

  • A systematic literature review of Javanese cultural transformation under modernisation and globalisation

    Open Access•Mausa Agrevinna, Bani Sudardi et al.•Discover Global Society•2026

  • Unsub Extender

    Open Access•Eric Schares•Quantitative Science Studies•2022

  • Covering artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Rubén Alcaraz Martínez, Mari Vállez et al.•Communication & Society•2024

  • Research trends in the development of generic skills

    Open Access•Diana Marleny Ramírez-Ramírez, Erica Agudelo-Ceballos et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Scoring big

    Open Access•Hanny Hafiar, Heru Ryanto Budiana et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • Análisis de citación, co-citación y co-palabras de los medios de comunicación pública y ecosistema digital

    Open Access•Luis Antonio Lopez Fraile, Eva Jiménez-García et al.•Revista Latina de Comunicación…•2023

  • La Formación Profesional Dual en España

    Open Access•Sonia Navajas Torrente, José Ángel Roldán Casas•Revista Complutense de Educación•2025

  • Evaluating the online impact of reporting guidelines for randomised trial reports and protocols

    Open Access•Enrique Orduña‐Malea, Adolfo Alonso‐Arroyo et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis

    Open Access•Robert Tomaszewski•Scientometrics•2023

  • A refinement strategy for identification of scientific software from bioinformatics publications

    Open Access•Lu Jiang, Xinyu Kang et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Australian Trends in Academic Literature Concerned With Family and Domestic Violence Perpetrators

    Open Access•Emi Patmisari, Holly Mclaren•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2023

  • Who are tweeting about academic publications? A systematic review and meta-analysis of altmetric studies

    Open Access•Ashraf Maleki, Kim Holmberg•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • A Bibliometric Approach to Translation Studies in English Literature (2020–2024)

    Open Access•Kavi Sheoran, Maithili Paikane•Fudan Journal of the Humanities…•2026

  • Approaching the Social Impact of Research Through a Literature Review

    Open Access•Alba Viana-Lora, Marta Nel·lo Andreu•International Journal of…•2021

  • Exploring the research evolution and global perspectives of water-sensitive cities

    Open Access•Golshan Hemati, Kayoumars Irandoost et al.•Environment Development and…•2025

  • Twitter as Method

    Bonnie Stewart•The Sage Handbook of Social Media…•2016

  • A topology of Twitter research

    Open Access•Michael Zimmer, Nicholas Proferes et al.•Aslib Journal of Information…•2014

  • Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases

    Open Access•Michael Gusenbauer•Scientometrics•2019

  • Dot-science top level domain

    Open Access•Enrique Orduña‐Malea•Scientometrics•2021

  • Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web

    Open Access•Han Woo Park, Mike Thelwall•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Software survey

    Open Access•Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman•Scientometrics•2009

Citations per year3
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae