Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis

Scientometric comparisons across Sars, Mers and 2019-nCoV literature

Bibliographic Data

ID21442384
AuthorsMilad Haghani (0000-0003-3904-5196, The University of Sydney, corresponding author), Michiel C J Bliemer (The University of Sydney)
Year2020
Volume125
Issue3
Pages2695-2726
Publication date2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-020-03706-z
PMID32981988
OpenAlexW3032472555
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited34

During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a quick and immediate surge of academic publications on its respective topic. The spike in research publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak, however, has been like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised scientific efforts at an unprecedented scale. In less than 5 months, more than 12,000 research items and in less than seven months, more than 30,000 items were indexed, while it is projected that the number could exceed 80,000 by the end of 2020, should the current trend continues. With the health crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems to have become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here, scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrasted with those of the two previous major coronavirus diseases, i.e., Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). The focus is on the co-occurrence of key-terms, bibliographic coupling and citation relations of journals and collaborations between countries. Interesting recurring patterns across all three literatures were discovered. All three outbreaks have commonly generated three distinct cohorts of studies: (i) studies linked to public health response and epidemic control, (ii) studies on chemical constitution of the virus; and (iii) studies related to treatment, vaccine and clinical care. While studies affiliated with category (i) seem to have been relatively earliest to emerge, they have overall received relatively smaller number of citations compared to publications the two other categories. Covid-19 studies seem to have been disseminated across a broader variety of journals and across a more diverse range of subject areas. Clear links are observed between the geographical origins of each outbreak as well as the local geographical severity of each outbreak and the magnitude of research originated from regions. Covid-19 studies also display the involvement of authors from a broader variety of countries compared to SARS and MERS. Considering the speed at which the Covid-19-related literature is accumulating, an interesting dimension that warrants further exploration could be to assess if the quality and rigour of these publications have been affected

Citation · Constitution · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Grey literature · Middle East respiratory syndrome · Outbreak · Pandemic · Public health · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) · Academic Publishing and Open Access · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access