CiteFusion
An ensemble framework for citation intent classification harnessing dual-model binary couples and SHAP analyses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21442610 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lorenzo Paolini (0009-0003-3803-4011, University of Bologna, corresponding author), Sahar Vahdati (0000-0002-7171-169X, Institut für Biomedizinische Analytik und NMR Imaging (Germany)), Angelo Di Iorio (0000-0003-2899-146X, University of Bologna), Robert Wardenga (0009-0004-3317-6122, Institut für Biomedizinische Analytik und NMR Imaging (Germany)), Ivan Heibi (0000-0001-5366-5194, University of Bologna), Silvio Peroni (0000-0003-0530-4305, University of Bologna) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 130 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 5911-5981 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-025-05418-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4415589270 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 59 |
Understanding the motivations underlying scholarly citations is essential to evaluate research impact and promote transparent scholarly communication. This study introduces CiteFusion , an ensemble framework designed to address the multi-class Citation Intent Classification task on two benchmark datasets: SciCite and ACL-ARC. The framework employs a one-vs-all decomposition of the multi-class task into class-specific binary subtasks, leveraging complementary pairs of SciBERT and XLNet models, independently tuned, for each citation intent. The outputs of these base models are aggregated through a feedforward neural network meta-classifier to reconstruct the original classification task. To enhance interpretability, SHAP ( SHapley Additive exPlanations ) is employed to analyze token-level contributions, and interactions among base models, providing transparency into the classification dynamics of CiteFusion, and insights about the kind of misclassifications of the ensemble. In addition, this work investigates the semantic role of structural context by incorporating section titles, as framing devices, into input sentences, assessing their positive impact on classification accuracy. CiteFusion ultimately demonstrates robust performance in imbalanced and data-scarce scenarios: experimental results show that CiteFusion achieves state-of-the-art performance, with Macro-F1 scores of 89.60% on SciCite, and 76.24% on ACL-ARC. Furthermore, to ensure interoperability and reusability, citation intents from both datasets schemas are mapped to Citation Typing Ontology (CiTO) object properties, highlighting some overlaps. Finally, we describe and release a web-based application that classifies citation intents leveraging the CiteFusion models developed on SciCite
Benchmark (surveying) · Benchmarking · Binary classification · Citation · Classifier (UML) · Context (archaeology) · Interoperability · Knowledge base · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
What does research reproducibility mean?
What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018
Effects of Explainable Artificial Intelligence on trust and human behavior in a high-risk decision task
Multi-task learning model for citation intent classification in scientific publications
Towards employing native information in citation function classification
Scite
A meta-analysis of semantic classification of citations
Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality
| Highly cited | No |
|---|