Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Applying advanced technologies to improve clinical trials

A systematic mapping study

Bibliographic Data

ID21443022
AuthorsEsther Nanzayi Ngayua (0000-0001-5161-158X, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology), Jianjia He (0000-0001-5987-3605, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, corresponding author), Kwabena Agyei-Boahene (0000-0003-1799-071X, Tongji University)
Year2021
Volume126
Issue2
Pages1217-1238
Publication date2021-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-020-03774-1
PMID33250544
OpenAlexW3108119861
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited14

The increasing demand for new therapies and other clinical interventions has made researchers conduct many clinical trials. The high level of evidence generated by clinical trials makes them the main approach to evaluating new clinical interventions. The increasing amounts of data to be considered in the planning and conducting of clinical trials has led to higher costs and increased timelines of clinical trials, with low productivity. Advanced technologies including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and the internet of things offer an opportunity to improve the efficiency and productivity of clinical trials at various stages. Although researchers have done some tangible work regarding the application of advanced technologies in clinical trials, the studies are yet to be mapped to give a general picture of the current state of research. This systematic mapping study was conducted to identify and analyze studies published on the role of advanced technologies in clinical trials. A search restricted to the period between 2010 and 2020 yielded a total of 443 articles. The analysis revealed a trend of increasing research interests in the area over the years. Recruitment and eligibility aspects were the main focus of the studies. The main research types were validation and evaluation studies. Most studies contributed methods and theories, hence there exists a gap for architecture, process, and metric contributions. In the future, more empirical studies are expected given the increasing interest to implement the AI, ML, DL, and IoT in clinical trials

Clinical trial · Data science · Management science · MEDLINE · Metric (unit) · Operations management · Productivity · Psychological intervention · Systematic review · Timeline · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

  • Scoping review of the current landscape of AI-based applications in clinical trials

    Open Access•Fidelia Cascini, Flavia Beccia et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Correlation Monitoring Method and model of Science-Technology-Industry in the AI Field

    Open Access•Xiaoli Wang, Yun Liu et al.•SAGE Open•2022

  • Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences

    Mark Petticrew, Helen Roberts•Systematic Reviews in the Social…•2006

  • Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering

    Open Access•K Petersen, Sairam Vakkalanka et al.•Information and Software Technology•2015

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae