Measuring academic entities’ impact by content-based citation analysis in a heterogeneous academic network
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21443044 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fang Zhang (0000-0001-8108-3132, Jiangsu University), Shengli Wu (0000-0003-2008-1736, Jiangsu University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 7197-7222 |
| Publication date | 2021-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-021-04063-1 |
| OpenAlex | W3168934600 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 43 |
Evaluating the impact of papers, researchers and venues objectively is of great significance to academia and beyond. This may help researchers, research organizations, and government agencies in various ways, such as helping researchers find valuable papers and authoritative venues and helping research organizations identify good researchers. A few studies find that rather than treating citations equally, differentiating them is a promising way for impact evaluation of academic entities. However, most of those methods are metadata-based only and do not consider contents of cited and citing papers; while a few content-based methods are not sophisticated, and further improvement is possible. In this paper, we study the citation relationships between entities by content-based approaches. Especially, an ensemble learning method is used to classify citations into different strength types, and a word-embedding based method is used to estimate topical similarity of the citing and cited papers. A heterogeneous network is constructed with the weighted citation links and several other features. Based on the heterogeneous network that consists of three types of entities, we apply an iterative PageRank-like method to rank the impact of papers, authors and venues at the same time through mutual reinforcement. Experiments are conducted on an ACL dataset, and the results demonstrate that our method greatly outperforms state-of-the art competitors in improving ranking effectiveness of papers, authors and venues, as well as in being robust against malicious manipulation of citations
Citation · Competitor analysis · Data science · Embedding · Information retrieval · Learning to rank · Metadata · PageRank · Rank (graph theory) · Ranking (information retrieval) · Similarity (geometry) · Word embedding · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Mathematics · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Research evaluation metrics comparison
Identification of topic evolution
The impact of qualitative methods on article citation
A Deep Multi-Tasking Approach Leveraging on Cited-Citing Paper Relationship For Citation Intent Classification
A review of scientific impact prediction
Exploring technology fusion by combining latent Dirichlet allocation with Doc2vec
Evaluating scientists by citation and disruption of their representative works
Theory and practise of the g-index
A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
HNRWalker
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |