Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing representations of a discipline derived through LDA vs. intellectual content analysis

The case of information science

Bibliographic Data

ID21443239
AuthorsKaisa Ylikruuvi (0009-0008-7591-4639, Tampere University), Kalervo Järvelin (0000-0001-7655-8930, Tampere University, corresponding author), Pertti Vakkari (0000-0002-4441-5393, Tampere University), Martti Juhola (0000-0003-2298-9553, Tampere University)
Year2025
Volume130
Issue8
Pages4309-4337
Publication date2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-025-05376-1
OpenAlexW4412684094
LanguageEN
References cited28

The paper looks at the methodology of empirical analyses of the content and structure of Information Science (IS). The traditional approach in empirical analysis is intellectual content analysis (ICA) of a representative data set. The high labor cost prohibits the analysis of massive data sets. A recent alternative is based on data mining/machine learning. Its strength is the capability of analyzing massive datasets efficiently. However, a significant issue is the quality of content analysis. The paper compares latent Dirichlet allocation/topic modeling (LDA/TM) based statistical analysis to ICA using the same data set, 1514 scholarly articles from the year 2015 volumes of 30 IS journals. The intellectual analysis provides the mirror for reflecting the TM results. LDA/TM is strong in identifying new directions of a discipline and processing masses of text. Its weaknesses include semantic haziness of topics due to bag-of-words article representation, text pre-processing, tuning of parameters, and being unanalytic in composing topics from words belonging to different categories

Content (measure theory) · Content analysis · Epistemology · Information retrieval · Social science · Sociology · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Web visibility and informetrics

  • Topicmodels

    Open Access•Bettina Grün, Kurt Hornik•Journal of Statistical Software•2011

  • Knowledge structure transition in library and information science

    Open Access•Yosuke Miyata, Emi Ishita et al.•Scientometrics•2020

  • Largest contribution to LIS by external disciplines as measured by the characteristics of research articles

    Open Access•Pertti Vakkari, Yu‐Wei Chang et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Evolution of research topics in LIS between 1996 and 2019

    Open Access•Xiaoyao Han•Scientometrics•2020

  • Cross-disciplinary collaboration versus coexistence in LIS serials

    Open Access•Cristóbal Urbano, Jordi Ardanuy•Scientometrics•2020

  • Extracting problem and method sentence from scientific papers

    Open Access•Yingyi Zhang, Chengzhi Zhang•Scientometrics•2024

  • Supervised Machine Learning for Text Analysis in R

    Emil Hvitfeldt, Julia Silge•Supervised Machine Learning for…•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae