Six flagship scientometric journals from a bibliometric perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21443548 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gergely Ferenc Lendvai (0000-0003-3298-8087, Ludovika University of Public Service, corresponding author), Péter Sasvári (0000-0002-4031-4843, University of Miskolc, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-026-05698-8 |
| OpenAlex | W7167364371 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 56 |
The present study offers a comprehensive bibliometric assessment of six flagship scientometric journals, namely, Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, Quantitative Science Studies, Journal of Information Science, Research Evaluation, and Publications, covering the 2014–2023 period. The examined journals were selected for their leading role in the distribution of scientometrics research as well as their thematic centrality, citation performance, and publisher diversity within the field. Our study aims to compare productivity and citation impact patterns, evaluate citation-based prestige metrics such as the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) and Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI), and quantify country-level concentration of publication output and citation impact across the geography of contribution. Data were extracted using Scopus and SciVal, yielding metadata on 6,471 publications. We employed bibliometric methods to analyze the journals’ performance including statistical analyses of publication metrics, citation analysis as well as the examination of internationalization practices of these journals. Analyses revealed notable disparities in output volume and citation distribution, with evidence of the Matthew effect and citation inequality across journals. Scientometrics is the most productive journal in the set, the Journal of Informetrics and Quantitative Science Studies lead the elite citation indicators, and lower-ranked outlets, such as MDPI’s Publications, draw their visibility largely from a small number of high-impact publications. Country-level analysis shows that contribution to these journals is strongly concentrated. Across 110 contributing countries, the top ten account for roughly three-fifths of publications and two-thirds of citations (publication Gini = 0.766; citation Gini = 0.792). Per-journal analysis reveals that the gap between citation and publication concentration varies by more than an order of magnitude across journals, from + 0.005 (JIS) to + 0.148 (QSS), indicating that journals differ markedly in how they convert publication access into citation reward
Bibliometrics · Citation · Citation analysis · Citation impact · Informetrics · Prestige · Productivity · Scientometrics · Scopus · Academic Publishing and Open Access · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Web visibility and informetrics
Little Science, Big Science
Performance-based university research funding systems
What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey
Data clustering
Networks of Scientific Papers
Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Matplotlib
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
A review of theory and practice in scientometrics
Bibliometrics
Bibliometrix
Comparison of disciplines, topics, and methods in studies in Journal of Informetrics and Scientometrics from 2016 to 2020
Article age- and field-normalized tools to evaluate scientific impact and momentum
Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network
Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries
Locked out, locked in and stuck
Developing an index of national research capacity
Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
A half-century of global collaboration in science and the “Shrinking World”
A Formula for the Gini Coefficient
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus
Exploring the Effects of North-South and South-South Research Collaboration in Emerging Economies, the Colombian Case
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |