Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level

Bibliographic Data

ID21443550
AuthorsTatiana Marina (0000-0001-9058-2419, National Research University Higher School of Economics, corresponding author), Ivan Sterligov (0000-0001-9736-4713, National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Year2021
Volume126
Issue6
Pages5019-5077
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-021-03899-x
OpenAlexW3151719968
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited39

Bibliographic database · Bibliometrics · Citation · Citation impact · Geography · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · Publishing · Scale (ratio) · Scopus · Web of science · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Law · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • The scholarly publishing landscape of ethnobotany in the Philippines

    Open Access•Cenice Nicole Magsayo, Ma Joselle Pulmones et al.•Ethnobotany Research and…•2024

  • Market for lemons in academia

    Open Access•Alisher Aldashev•Scientometrics•2026

  • Occurrence Frequency of Rhetorical Moves in Introductions of Linguistics Research Articles From Non-Scopus and Scopus Journals

    Open Access•Hui Geng, Geok Imm Lee et al.•Journal of Language Teaching and…•2023

  • The Development of Sustainability and Education Research in Indonesia

    Open Access•Novinta Nurulsari, Bambang Sumintono et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • Drawing Inspiration from the World of Fine Art in the Battle Against Predatory Publishing

    Open Access•Graham Kendall•Publishing Research Quarterly•2022

  • The impact of the ‘publish or perish’ culture on research practices and academic life in Kazakhstan

    Open Access•Aigerim Bayanbayeva•Higher Education Research &…•2026

  • Scientometric indicators in research evaluation and research misconduct

    Open Access•Andrey Lovakov, Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva•Scientometrics•2025

  • Beyond collaboration

    Open Access•Katerina Guba•Scientometrics•2025

  • Research topic switch and its relation to appointment as university leader

    Open Access•Daria Gerashchenko•Scientometrics•2024

  • Disciplinary and institutional shifts

    Open Access•Denis Kosyakov, Andrey Guskov•Scientometrics•2024

  • Why do sociologists on academic periphery willingly support bibliometric indicators

    Open Access•Katerina Guba•Scientometrics•2024

  • Reasons and consequences of changes in Russian research assessment policies

    Open Access•Denis Kosyakov, Andrey Guskov•Scientometrics•2022

  • From the Soviet Union to the Russian Federation

    Open Access•Леонид Гохберг, Leonid Gokhberg et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Evaluating the visual design of science publications—a quantitative approach comparing legitimate and predatory journal papers

    Open Access•Andreas Siess•Scientometrics•2025

  • ResearchGate and Google Scholar

    Open Access•Vivek Kumar Singh, Satya Swarup Srichandan et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Independent Russian medical science

    Open Access•Ekaterina Dyachenko, Юрий Агафонов et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Scientific Productivity and Retracted Literature of Authors with Kazakhstani Affiliations During 2013–2023

    Open Access•Kadyrzhan Smagulov, Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva•Journal of Academic Ethics•2025

  • Global university rankings and the dissemination of the Western university model

    Open Access•Aigerim Bayanbayeva•Globalisation Societies and…•2025

  • Early career researchers and predatory journals during the Covid-19 pandemic. An international analysis

    Open Access•Diana Nicholas, Blanca Rodríguez Bravo et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2023

  • Factors of Research Misconduct in Transitional Contexts

    Open Access•Aliya Kuzhabekova, Tatyana Kim et al.•Higher Education Quarterly•2026

  • Wolf in sheep's clothing

    Open Access•Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, Walton Wider et al.•Social Science Information•2025

  • Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science

    Open Access•Anne-Wil Harzing, Satu Alakangas•Scientometrics•2016

  • Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis

    William Kruskal, William H Kruskal et al.•Journal of the American…•1952

  • Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

    Open Access•John Bohannon•Science•2013

  • Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review

    Sarah De Rijcke, Paul Wouters et al.•Research Evaluation•2016

  • Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system

    Open Access•P Weingart•Scientometrics•2005

  • A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

    Open Access•Ludo Waltman•Journal of Informetrics•2016

  • ‘Predatory’ open access

    Open Access•Cenyu Shen, Bo‐Christer Björk et al.•BMC Medicine•2015

  • The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus

    Open Access•Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus•Scientometrics•2015

Unique citing works21
Citations per year5,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae